RLSIX vs. JAKVX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX).

RLSIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2012. JAKVX is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Apr 11, 2014.

Performance

RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund	-12.16%	15.55%
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6	4.41%	17.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLSIX achieves a -12.16% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 4.41% return.

RLSIX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -6.41%
• YTD: -12.16%
• 6M: -12.05%
• 1Y: 1.19%
• 3Y*: 11.41%
• 5Y*: -5.17%
• 10Y*: 5.37%

JAKVX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -4.76%
• YTD: 4.41%
• 6M: 6.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.

RLSIX

RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund

JAKVX

John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6

Return for Risk

RLSIX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLSIX

RLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
RLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
RLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLSIX	JAKVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.24	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLSIX	JAKVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	3.48	-3.15

Correlation

The correlation between RLSIX and JAKVX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison

RLSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.94%	11.66%	1.26%
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6	8.12%	8.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLSIX drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLSIX and JAKVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLSIX	JAKVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-5.16%	-55.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.87%	-4.76%	-30.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.92%	-0.80%	-14.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RLSIX	JAKVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.58%	7.12%	+9.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.20%	7.12%	+18.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.52%	7.12%	+14.40%