RLSIX vs. JAKVX
RLSIX (RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund) and JAKVX (John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past year, RLSIX returned 5.93% vs 20.05% for JAKVX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RLSIX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for JAKVX.
Performance
RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLSIX achieves a -2.98% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 9.63% return.
RLSIX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -2.98%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- 1Y
- 5.93%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.72%
JAKVX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.46%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | -2.98% | 15.72% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 9.63% | 17.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLSIX and JAKVX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLSIX vs. JAKVX — Risk / Return Rank
RLSIX
JAKVX
RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLSIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.49 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.82 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 12.82 | -11.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLSIX drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLSIX and JAKVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLSIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -5.16% | -55.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.56% | -5.16% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.06% | -3.87% | -24.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -0.84% | -14.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 1.53% | +3.55% |
Volatility
RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) at 2.81%. This indicates that RLSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAKVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLSIX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 2.81% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 6.33% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 7.78% | +4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 7.56% | +17.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 7.56% | +14.01% |
RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
RLSIX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison
RLSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.73% | 8.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.94% | 11.66% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLSIX and JAKVX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLSIX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to JAKVX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLSIX dropped -60.82% vs JAKVX's -5.16%.
JAKVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLSIX and JAKVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer