RLSIX vs. NLSIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RLSIX (RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund) and NLSIX (Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, RLSIX returned 6.72%/yr vs 6.90%/yr for NLSIX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RLSIX charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for NLSIX.

Performance

RLSIX vs. NLSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLSIX achieves a -2.98% return, which is significantly lower than NLSIX's 1.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RLSIX having a 6.72% annualized return and NLSIX not far ahead at 6.90%.

RLSIX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -1.25%
• YTD: -2.98%
• 6M: -2.98%
• 1Y: 5.93%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: -5.21%
• 10Y*: 6.72%

NLSIX

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 6.72%
• 3Y*: 7.42%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 6.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLSIX vs. NLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund	-2.98%	8.57%	16.06%	43.85%	-53.89%	2.10%	54.74%	20.00%	-2.20%	22.10%
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	1.89%	7.20%	7.47%	13.10%	-6.85%	9.01%	15.27%	17.11%	-6.92%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between RLSIX and NLSIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2011	0.72

The correlation between RLSIX and NLSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RLSIX vs. NLSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLSIX

RLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
RLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
RLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
RLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
RLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
RLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

NLSIX

NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 23
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLSIX vs. NLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) and Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RLSIX	NLSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	1.29	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	1.89	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.24	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	1.53	-1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.07	5.77	-4.70

RLSIX vs. NLSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the NLSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLSIX and NLSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RLSIX vs. NLSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLSIX drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than NLSIX's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLSIX and NLSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLSIX	NLSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-14.75%	-46.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.56%	-4.39%	-10.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.62%	-6.90%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.82%	-10.79%	-50.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.82%	-14.75%	-46.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.06%	-1.02%	-27.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.12%	-2.01%	-13.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.08%	1.16%	+3.92%

Volatility

RLSIX vs. NLSIX - Volatility Comparison

RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) at 2.14%. This indicates that RLSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLSIX	NLSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	2.14%	+2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	4.32%	+5.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.13%	5.22%	+6.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.97%	6.70%	+18.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.57%	7.34%	+14.23%

RLSIX vs. NLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLSIX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NLSIX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

RLSIX vs. NLSIX - Dividend Comparison

RLSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund	0.05%	0.05%	0.02%	0.97%	7.01%	1.13%	2.15%	2.39%	5.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.94%	11.66%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLSIX and NLSIX in my portfolio?

RLSIX and NLSIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RLSIX or NLSIX?

RLSIX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to NLSIX (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLSIX dropped -60.82% vs NLSIX's -14.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NLSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.