RLGT vs. PETS
RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.) and PETS (PetMed Express, Inc.) are both stocks. RLGT operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials), while PETS operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, RLGT returned 10.53%/yr vs -17.93%/yr for PETS. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RLGT vs. PETS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLGT achieves a 45.34% return, which is significantly higher than PETS's -42.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RLGT has outperformed PETS with an annualized return of 10.53%, while PETS has yielded a comparatively lower -17.93% annualized return.
RLGT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 45.34%
- 6M
- 37.72%
- 1Y
- 54.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
PETS
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -17.04%
- YTD
- -42.19%
- 6M
- -37.07%
- 1Y
- -48.18%
- 3Y*
- -49.51%
- 5Y*
- -42.21%
- 10Y*
- -17.93%
RLGT vs. PETS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 45.34% | -5.52% | 0.90% | 30.45% | -30.18% | 25.69% | 4.13% | 31.06% | -7.61% | 17.95% |
PETS PetMed Express, Inc. | -42.19% | -33.61% | -36.24% | -54.76% | -25.83% | -18.17% | 41.49% | 6.52% | -47.35% | 102.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLGT and PETS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2006 | 0.16 |
The correlation between RLGT and PETS shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RLGT:
$446.58M
PETS:
$38.91M
RLGT:
$0.33
PETS:
-$2.74
RLGT:
0.50
PETS:
0.22
RLGT:
1.91
PETS:
1.34
RLGT:
$893.50M
PETS:
$179.02M
RLGT:
$113.69M
PETS:
$50.22M
RLGT:
$27.72M
PETS:
-$46.12M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLGT vs. PETS — Risk / Return Rank
RLGT
PETS
RLGT vs. PETS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLGT | PETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.93 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | -0.83 | +3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | -1.46 | +7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLGT vs. PETS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, smaller than the maximum PETS drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLGT and PETS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLGT | PETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.68% | -98.29% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -59.80% | +42.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.53% | -88.82% | +52.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.29% | -94.84% | +51.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.67% | -96.40% | +39.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -95.84% | +95.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.86% | -44.38% | +11.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.06% | 33.97% | -25.91% |
Volatility
RLGT vs. PETS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) is 7.86%, while PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) has a volatility of 22.35%. This indicates that RLGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PETS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLGT | PETS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 22.35% | -14.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.32% | 69.97% | -38.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.41% | 98.42% | -60.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.48% | 64.24% | -25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.12% | 62.86% | -18.74% |
Dividends
RLGT vs. PETS - Dividend Comparison
Neither RLGT nor PETS has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PETS PetMed Express, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.90% | 6.78% | 4.67% | 3.46% | 4.59% | 4.47% | 1.74% | 3.25% | 4.14% |
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RLGT vs. PETS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and PetMed Express, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RLGT vs. PETS - Profitability Comparison
RLGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PETS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.23M and revenue of 42.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
RLGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
PETS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported an operating income of -32.95M and revenue of 42.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -77.0%.
RLGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 4.67M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
PETS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a net income of -4.06M and revenue of 42.82M, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RLGT and PETS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PETS has higher volatility (22.35%) compared to RLGT (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLGT dropped -92.68% vs PETS's -98.29%.
RLGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLGT and PETS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer