PETS vs. LYG
PETS (PetMed Express, Inc.) and LYG (Lloyds Banking Group plc) are both stocks. PETS operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare), while LYG operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, PETS returned -16.94%/yr vs 7.45%/yr for LYG. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PETS vs. LYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PETS achieves a -33.44% return, which is significantly lower than LYG's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, PETS has underperformed LYG with an annualized return of -16.94%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.45% annualized return.
PETS
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- YTD
- -33.44%
- 6M
- 23.12%
- 1Y
- -44.24%
- 3Y*
- -48.16%
- 5Y*
- -40.63%
- 10Y*
- -16.94%
LYG
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- 1Y
- 32.27%
- 3Y*
- 40.62%
- 5Y*
- 20.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.45%
PETS vs. LYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PETS PetMed Express, Inc. | -33.44% | -33.61% | -36.24% | -54.76% | -25.83% | -18.17% | 41.49% | 6.52% | -47.35% | 102.05% |
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 4.96% | 103.71% | 20.30% | 14.68% | -9.47% | 33.81% | -40.79% | 36.81% | -28.35% | 30.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PETS and LYG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2001 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
PETS:
-$2.74
LYG:
$0.45
PETS:
0.25
LYG:
0.94
PETS:
$179.02M
LYG:
$65.49B
PETS:
$50.22M
LYG:
$65.49B
PETS:
-$46.12M
LYG:
$7.17B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PETS vs. LYG — Risk / Return Rank
PETS
LYG
PETS vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PETS | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | 1.16 | -1.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | 1.72 | -2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.21 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 1.50 | -2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 4.26 | -5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PETS | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | 1.16 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.64 | 0.63 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.27 | 0.20 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | -0.03 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
PETS vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PETS drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, roughly equal to the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PETS and LYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PETS | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -94.84% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.81% | -22.72% | -39.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.53% | -22.72% | -66.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.84% | -40.19% | -54.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.40% | -68.72% | -27.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.21% | -56.62% | -38.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.33% | -63.42% | +19.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.72% | 8.02% | +27.70% |
Volatility
PETS vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) is 9.60%, while Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that PETS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PETS | LYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.60% | 10.19% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.68% | 21.64% | +46.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.32% | 27.88% | +69.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.09% | 32.05% | +33.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.58% | 36.51% | +26.07% |
Dividends
PETS vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison
PETS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 3.67% | 3.19% | 5.44% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 5.04% | 6.63% | 6.81% | 5.17% | 2.11% |
PETS PetMed Express, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.90% | 6.78% | 4.67% | 3.46% | 4.59% | 4.47% | 1.74% | 3.25% | 4.14% |
Financials
PETS vs. LYG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PetMed Express, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PETS vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison
PETS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.23M and revenue of 42.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
LYG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
PETS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported an operating income of -32.95M and revenue of 42.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -77.0%.
LYG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.
PETS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a net income of -4.06M and revenue of 42.82M, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.
LYG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PETS and LYG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LYG has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to PETS (9.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PETS dropped -98.29% vs LYG's -94.84%.
LYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PETS and LYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer