PETS vs. MO
PETS (PetMed Express, Inc.) and MO (Altria Group, Inc.) are both stocks. PETS operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare), while MO operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PETS returned -18.51%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for MO. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PETS vs. MO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PETS achieves a -39.06% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 22.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PETS has underperformed MO with an annualized return of -18.51%, while MO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.21% annualized return.
PETS
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- 6M
- -38.87%
- YTD
- -39.06%
- 1Y
- -39.81%
- 3Y*
- -47.49%
- 5Y*
- -41.07%
- 10Y*
- -18.51%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.82%
MO
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- YTD
- 22.29%
- 1Y
- 18.10%
- 3Y*
- 23.87%
- 5Y*
- 15.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $637.73M | $559.86M | $594.92M | |
| $213.81K | $289.81K | $1.25M |
PETS vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PETS PetMed Express, Inc. | -39.06% | -33.61% | -36.24% | -54.76% | -25.83% | -18.17% | 41.49% | 6.52% | -47.35% | 102.05% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 22.29% | 18.17% | 40.76% | -3.70% | 4.37% | 24.18% | -10.21% | 7.87% | -27.14% | 9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PETS and MO is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 1999 | 0.11 |
The correlation between PETS and MO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PETS:
$41.68M
MO:
$114.07B
PETS:
-$2.73
MO:
$4.76
PETS:
0.23
MO:
5.24
PETS:
$179.02M
MO:
$21.87B
PETS:
$50.22M
MO:
$15.52B
PETS:
-$46.12M
MO:
$11.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PETS vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank
PETS
MO
PETS vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PETS | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.15 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | 1.09 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.10 | 2.71 | -3.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PETS vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PETS drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than MO's maximum drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PETS and MO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PETS | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -65.43% | -32.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.92% | -16.40% | -40.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.73% | -16.40% | -71.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.34% | -25.83% | -68.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.40% | -53.69% | -42.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.62% | -8.80% | -86.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.63% | -11.90% | -32.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.00% | 6.59% | +27.41% |
Volatility
PETS vs. MO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PetMed Express, Inc. (PETS) is 9.68%, while Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that PETS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PETS | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 12.13% | -2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.29% | 20.12% | +13.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.12% | 24.97% | +72.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.09% | 21.27% | +42.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.97% | 23.29% | +39.68% |
Dividends
PETS vs. MO - Dividend Comparison
PETS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 6.21% | 7.21% | 7.65% | 9.52% | 8.05% | 7.43% | 8.29% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 3.56% | 3.48% | 3.73% |
PETS PetMed Express, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.90% | 6.78% | 4.67% | 3.46% | 4.59% | 4.47% | 1.74% | 3.25% | 4.14% |
Financials
PETS vs. MO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PetMed Express, Inc. and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PETS vs. MO - Profitability Comparison
PETS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.23M and revenue of 42.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
MO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.58B and revenue of 6.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
PETS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported an operating income of -32.95M and revenue of 42.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -77.0%.
MO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.14B and revenue of 6.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
PETS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PetMed Express, Inc. reported a net income of -4.06M and revenue of 42.82M, resulting in a net margin of -9.5%.
MO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 6.11B, resulting in a net margin of 37.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PETS and MO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MO has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to PETS (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PETS dropped -98.29% vs MO's -65.43%.
MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PETS and MO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer