RLBGX vs. VTMFX
RLBGX (American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, RLBGX returned 10.56%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for VTMFX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RLBGX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.
Performance
RLBGX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLBGX achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RLBGX has outperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
RLBGX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
VTMFX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 14.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
RLBGX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLBGX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 | 9.55% | 18.83% | 15.35% | 13.92% | -11.85% | 16.10% | 11.20% | 18.95% | -3.07% | 14.97% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 5.23% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 18.01% | -1.40% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLBGX and VTMFX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RLBGX and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLBGX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
RLBGX
VTMFX
RLBGX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLBGX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.46 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.91 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.17 | 13.60 | +1.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLBGX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLBGX drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum VTMFX drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLBGX and VTMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLBGX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -28.49% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.98% | -5.38% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.65% | -10.61% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.59% | -17.40% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.33% | -21.87% | -0.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.75% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -3.54% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.15% | +0.42% |
Volatility
RLBGX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.45%. This indicates that RLBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLBGX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 2.45% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 5.18% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.19% | 6.46% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.57% | 8.57% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.72% | 9.15% | +1.57% |
RLBGX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLBGX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RLBGX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
RLBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than VTMFX's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLBGX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 | 7.41% | 8.56% | 7.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 4.59% | 4.65% | 3.78% | 5.81% | 4.92% | 4.54% | 5.91% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, RLBGX and VTMFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
RLBGX has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to VTMFX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLBGX dropped -22.33% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.
RLBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLBGX and VTMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer