RLBGX vs. FMUAX
RLBGX (American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6) and FMUAX (Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, RLBGX returned 10.06%/yr vs 6.03%/yr for FMUAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RLBGX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FMUAX.
Performance
RLBGX vs. FMUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLBGX achieves a 8.69% return, which is significantly higher than FMUAX's 6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RLBGX has outperformed FMUAX with an annualized return of 10.06%, while FMUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.03% annualized return.
RLBGX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 8.69%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
FMUAX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 14.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.98%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
RLBGX vs. FMUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLBGX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 | 8.69% | 18.83% | 15.35% | 13.92% | -11.85% | 16.10% | 11.20% | 18.95% | -3.07% | 14.97% |
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund | 6.51% | 9.00% | 8.70% | 9.81% | -10.68% | 10.32% | 8.48% | 15.16% | -5.24% | 11.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLBGX and FMUAX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RLBGX and FMUAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLBGX vs. FMUAX — Risk / Return Rank
RLBGX
FMUAX
RLBGX vs. FMUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) and Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLBGX | FMUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.57 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 3.72 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 17.99 | -6.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLBGX vs. FMUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLBGX drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FMUAX drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLBGX and FMUAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLBGX | FMUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -22.43% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.98% | -4.94% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.65% | -10.18% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.59% | -15.93% | -2.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.33% | -21.46% | -0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -0.30% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.45% | -2.74% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 0.95% | +0.64% |
Volatility
RLBGX vs. FMUAX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund (FMUAX) at 1.57%. This indicates that RLBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLBGX | FMUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 1.57% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.38% | 4.84% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.25% | 6.22% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 7.21% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 8.12% | +2.57% |
RLBGX vs. FMUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RLBGX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FMUAX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RLBGX vs. FMUAX - Dividend Comparison
RLBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than FMUAX's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMUAX Federated Hermes Municipal and Stock Advantage Fund | 1.42% | 1.23% | 2.01% | 2.53% | 2.25% | 4.56% | 2.12% | 4.00% | 7.98% | 2.17% | 2.36% | 2.80% |
RLBGX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 | 7.46% | 8.56% | 7.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 4.59% | 4.65% | 3.78% | 5.81% | 4.92% | 4.54% | 5.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RLBGX and FMUAX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RLBGX has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to FMUAX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLBGX dropped -22.33% vs FMUAX's -22.43%.
FMUAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLBGX and FMUAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer