RKT vs. SCHG
RKT (Rocket Companies, Inc.) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 5 years, RKT returned -8.35%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RKT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RKT achieves a -36.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 3.75% return.
RKT
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -21.29%
- YTD
- -36.21%
- 6M
- -34.34%
- 1Y
- -3.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- -8.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 20.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.90%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
RKT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc. | -36.21% | 81.69% | -22.24% | 106.86% | -46.18% | -27.56% | 12.33% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RKT and SCHG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2020 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RKT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
RKT
SCHG
RKT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RKT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.24 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 1.27 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | 4.25 | -4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RKT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 1.33 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.67 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.83 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
RKT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RKT drawdown since its inception was -83.00%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKT and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RKT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.00% | -34.59% | -48.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.31% | -16.41% | -30.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.60% | -23.39% | -27.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.39% | -34.59% | -32.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.67% | -4.25% | -60.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.17% | -5.20% | -54.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.62% | 4.91% | +17.71% |
Volatility
RKT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) has a higher volatility of 20.75% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.52%. This indicates that RKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RKT | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.75% | 4.52% | +16.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.53% | 12.02% | +30.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.42% | 15.77% | +42.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.55% | 22.31% | +31.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.41% | 21.58% | +42.83% |
Dividends
RKT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
RKT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc. | 0.00% | 4.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.43% | 7.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RKT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RKT has higher volatility (20.75%) compared to SCHG (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RKT dropped -83.00% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RKT and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer