PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RISN vs. EAOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RISN vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RISN vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
-0.99%10.83%7.61%10.29%-18.06%22.47%7.73%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
-0.60%12.90%7.29%11.83%-15.48%6.39%7.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RISN achieves a -0.99% return, which is significantly lower than EAOM's -0.60% return.


RISN

1D
-0.03%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
-3.07%
1Y
12.18%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*

EAOM

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
0.88%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RISN vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RISN has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RISN vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RISN
RISN Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RISN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RISN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISN Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RISN vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RISNEAOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.37

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

1.99

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.99

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.14

8.33

-3.19

RISN vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RISN Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RISN and EAOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RISNEAOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.37

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.46

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.65

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between RISN and EAOM is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RISN vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

RISN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than EAOM's 2.91% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
RISN
Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF
1.11%0.98%1.39%2.05%1.27%9.74%4.71%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.91%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%

Drawdowns

RISN vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RISN drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than EAOM's maximum drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RISN and EAOM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RISNEAOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-20.73%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-5.67%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-20.73%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.76%

-3.31%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.67%

-5.09%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.35%

+1.03%

Volatility

RISN vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Tactical Balanced ESG ETF (RISN) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) at 3.27%. This indicates that RISN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RISNEAOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

3.27%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

4.82%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.09%

8.04%

+7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

8.01%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

7.91%

+3.39%