RIO vs. WMB
RIO (Rio Tinto Group) and WMB (The Williams Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. RIO operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while WMB operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, RIO returned 22.54%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for WMB. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIO vs. WMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 35.32% return, which is significantly higher than WMB's 21.67% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed WMB with an annualized return of 22.54%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively lower 19.28% annualized return.
RIO
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- 35.32%
- 6M
- 43.14%
- 1Y
- 89.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 22.54%
WMB
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 24.82%
- 3Y*
- 38.58%
- 5Y*
- 26.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
RIO vs. WMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 35.32% | 44.47% | -15.36% | 11.06% | 18.48% | -3.67% | 36.22% | 33.18% | -2.93% | 44.87% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 21.67% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 32.83% | 38.36% | -8.20% | 14.18% | -23.88% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIO and WMB is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1990 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RIO and WMB has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
RIO:
$172.61B
WMB:
$88.15B
RIO:
$13.11
WMB:
$2.28
RIO:
8.03
WMB:
31.55
RIO:
1.55
WMB:
7.39
RIO:
2.77
WMB:
6.80
RIO:
$111.41B
WMB:
$11.92B
RIO:
$31.10B
WMB:
$7.49B
RIO:
$40.42B
WMB:
$6.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIO vs. WMB — Risk / Return Rank
RIO
WMB
RIO vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIO | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.20 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.89 | 2.02 | +3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.91 | 4.27 | +17.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIO vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and WMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIO | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.97% | -98.03% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -12.36% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -12.36% | -11.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.25% | -23.01% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.47% | -68.08% | +30.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -8.55% | +2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.76% | -27.07% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 5.82% | -1.73% |
Volatility
RIO vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison
Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) at 7.36%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIO | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 7.36% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.27% | 15.58% | +8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.32% | 23.00% | +6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.30% | 23.62% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.65% | 30.95% | -0.30% |
Dividends
RIO vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison
RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than WMB's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 3.82% | 4.66% | 7.40% | 5.40% | 10.48% | 10.23% | 5.13% | 7.68% | 6.32% | 4.47% | 3.93% | 7.58% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 3.54% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
Financials
RIO vs. WMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and The Williams Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIO vs. WMB - Profitability Comparison
RIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
WMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.49B and revenue of 3.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.
RIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
WMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32B and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.6%.
RIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
WMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 865.00M and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in a net margin of 28.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIO and WMB have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIO has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to WMB (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs WMB's -98.03%.
RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIO and WMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer