RIO vs. SQM
RIO (Rio Tinto Group) and SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — RIO in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, SQM in Chemicals. Over the past 10 years, RIO returned 18.65%/yr vs 14.85%/yr for SQM. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RIO vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 17.71% return, which is significantly higher than SQM's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO has outperformed SQM with an annualized return of 18.65%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.85% annualized return.
RIO
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 17.71%
- 1Y
- 55.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.79%
SQM
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- 6M
- -19.84%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- 73.14%
- 3Y*
- -2.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $254.06M | $257.39M | $269.34M | |
| $71.35M | $64.86M | $87.80M |
RIO vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 17.71% | 44.47% | -15.36% | 11.06% | 18.48% | -3.67% | 36.22% | 33.18% | -2.93% | 44.87% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | -1.70% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIO and SQM is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 1993 | 0.37 |
The correlation between RIO and SQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RIO:
$148.82B
SQM:
$19.10B
RIO:
$13.11
SQM:
$2.86
RIO:
6.99
SQM:
23.36
RIO:
1.35
SQM:
3.59
RIO:
2.41
SQM:
3.26
RIO:
$111.41B
SQM:
$5.31B
RIO:
$31.10B
SQM:
$1.83B
RIO:
$40.42B
SQM:
$1.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIO vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank
RIO
SQM
RIO vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIO | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.46 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 6.52 | +1.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIO vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than SQM's maximum drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and SQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIO | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.97% | -78.34% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.74% | -29.91% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -58.62% | +34.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.25% | -69.76% | +34.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.47% | -72.98% | +35.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -31.79% | +13.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -30.30% | +6.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.89% | 11.26% | -4.37% |
Volatility
RIO vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is 7.66%, while Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that RIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIO | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | 12.96% | -5.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.49% | 36.73% | -12.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.42% | 50.66% | -21.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 49.88% | -20.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 46.27% | -15.87% |
Dividends
RIO vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than SQM's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIO Rio Tinto Group | 4.39% | 4.66% | 7.40% | 5.40% | 10.48% | 10.23% | 5.13% | 7.68% | 6.32% | 4.47% | 3.93% | 7.58% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.72% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Financials
RIO vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIO vs. SQM - Profitability Comparison
RIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
SQM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 778.60M and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.
RIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
SQM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 729.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.
RIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
SQM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 364.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIO and SQM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQM has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to RIO (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs SQM's -78.34%.
RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIO and SQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer