PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RINT vs. IDHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RINT vs. IDHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINT achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than IDHQ's 27.25% return.


RINT

1D
0.14%
1M
1.79%
6M
6.25%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.16%

IDHQ

1D
0.78%
1M
0.59%
6M
18.33%
YTD
27.25%
1Y
42.41%
3Y*
20.69%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.00M$6.33M$5.63M
$631.20K$544.70K$524.60K

RINT vs. IDHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RINT and IDHQ is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.90

The correlation between RINT and IDHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RINT vs. IDHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RINT
RINT Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IDHQ
IDHQ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IDHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RINT vs. IDHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RINTIDHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

3.17

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

12.70

-4.69

RINT vs. IDHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the IDHQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and IDHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RINT vs. IDHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum IDHQ drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and IDHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RINTIDHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.91%

-73.84%

+61.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-13.44%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.27%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-21.03%

+19.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.35%

-0.22%

Volatility

RINT vs. IDHQ - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF (IDHQ) at 4.02%. This indicates that RINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RINTIDHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.02%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

18.89%

-5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

20.72%

-5.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

17.86%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.88%

17.98%

-3.10%

RINT vs. IDHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IDHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

RINT vs. IDHQ - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than IDHQ's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDHQ
Invesco S&P International Developed High Quality ETF
1.99%2.46%2.41%2.52%3.33%2.10%1.60%2.10%2.67%1.68%2.36%1.71%
RINT
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF
0.80%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, RINT and IDHQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RINT has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to IDHQ (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs IDHQ's -73.84%.

On 1-year performance, IDHQ leads with 42.41% vs 25.05% for RINT. On fees, IDHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IDHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDHQ has performed better with a 42.41% return vs 25.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RINT.

IDHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.80% for RINT.

RINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDHQ is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Russell and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 0.29% for IDHQ.

IDHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RINT and IDHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer