RINT vs. RGLO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) and RGLO (Russell Investments Global Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Russell, while RGLO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Russell. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RINT returned 25.36% vs 28.81% for RGLO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.

Performance

RINT vs. RGLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RINT having a 9.99% return and RGLO slightly lower at 9.72%.

RINT

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 2.13%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 25.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RGLO

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 9.72%
• 6M: 9.92%
• 1Y: 28.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINT vs. RGLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	9.99%	13.26%
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	9.72%	17.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RINT and RGLO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2025	0.84

The correlation between RINT and RGLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RINT vs. RGLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINT

RINT Risk / Return Rank: 49
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

RGLO

RGLO Risk / Return Rank: 69
RGLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RGLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
RGLO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RGLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RGLO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINT vs. RGLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RINT	RGLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	2.20	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	3.04	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.40	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	3.01	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.04	13.30	-5.26

RINT vs. RGLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the RGLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and RGLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RINT vs. RGLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, which is greater than RGLO's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and RGLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINT	RGLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-9.61%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-9.61%	-2.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.39%	+1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-1.19%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	2.17%	+0.99%

Volatility

RINT vs. RGLO - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINT	RGLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	4.47%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.92%	10.57%	+2.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.20%	13.18%	+2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.86%	13.01%	+1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.86%	13.01%	+1.85%

RINT vs. RGLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RINT and RGLO have an expense ratio of 0.49%.

Dividends

RINT vs. RGLO - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than RGLO's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RGLO Russell Investments Global Equity ETF	0.58%	0.63%
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	0.81%	0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINT and RGLO in my portfolio?

RINT and RGLO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RINT or RGLO?

RINT has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to RGLO (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs RGLO's -9.61%.

Which ETF is better, RINT or RGLO?

On 1-year performance, RGLO leads with 28.81% vs 25.36% for RINT. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RINT or RGLO?

Over the 1-year period, RGLO has performed better with a 28.81% return vs 25.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINT or RGLO?

RINT and RGLO have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINT or RGLO?

RINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.58% for RGLO.

What is the main difference between RINT and RGLO?

RINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while RGLO is Global Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.