PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RING vs. ESPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RING vs. ESPR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while ESPR (Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, RING returned 13.85%/yr vs -14.95%/yr for ESPR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RING vs. ESPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly higher than ESPR's -14.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has outperformed ESPR with an annualized return of 13.85%, while ESPR has yielded a comparatively lower -14.95% annualized return.

RING

1D
3.20%
1M
-16.79%
YTD
-5.54%
6M
-4.18%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
44.87%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
13.85%

ESPR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-14.86%
6M
-18.18%
1Y
162.50%
3Y*
35.36%
5Y*
-34.62%
10Y*
-14.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RING vs. ESPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF		-5.54%164.72%15.98%12.29%-15.40%-7.46%24.98%49.92%-13.14%10.24%
ESPR
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.		-14.86%68.18%-26.42%-52.01%24.60%-80.77%-56.40%29.63%-30.13%425.88%

Correlation

The correlation between RING and ESPR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.

Often compared with RING:
RING vs. GDXRING vs. GLDRING vs. SLVPRING vs. AUMIRING vs. GOLDRING vs. FGDLRING vs. SPY
Often compared with ESPR:
ESPR vs. NUVBESPR vs. ZIMESPR vs. YCBDESPR vs. ASESPR vs. AQSTESPR vs. ARKFESPR vs. ACMR

Return for Risk

RING vs. ESPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RING
RING Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
ESPR
ESPR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ESPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RING vs. ESPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RINGESPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
1.76

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.62
2.86

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.07

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

7.68

-3.23

RING vs. ESPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the ESPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and ESPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RING vs. ESPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, smaller than the maximum ESPR drawdown of -99.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and ESPR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RINGESPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.47%

-99.37%

+19.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.72%

-53.19%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.72%

-80.94%

+45.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.94%

-97.16%

+49.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

-99.10%

+47.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.03%

-97.27%

+67.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.36%

-69.99%

+22.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.74%

21.30%

-8.56%

Volatility

RING vs. ESPR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a higher volatility of 16.83% compared to Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. (ESPR) at 1.06%. This indicates that RING's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RINGESPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.83%

1.06%

+15.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.11%

61.44%

-22.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.31%

92.66%

-45.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.81%

91.79%

-54.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.70%

84.61%

-47.91%

Dividends

RING vs. ESPR - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ESPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESPR
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF		0.89%0.84%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.83%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.41%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

RING and ESPR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RING has higher volatility (16.83%) compared to ESPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs ESPR's -99.37%.

ESPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RING and ESPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer