RIGS vs. SDOG
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG).
RIGS and SDOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. SDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2012.
Performance
RIGS vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.29% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 8.59% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than SDOG's 8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 3.30%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.38% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 16.26%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SDOG's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
SDOG
RIGS vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.01 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 1.48 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.21 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 1.34 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 5.74 | -4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.01 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.58 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.49 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.63 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and SDOG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than SDOG's 3.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.52% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum SDOG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and SDOG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -43.56% | +28.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -13.12% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -19.84% | +10.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -43.56% | +28.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -3.25% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -4.96% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 3.08% | -1.04% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 2.34%, while ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.34% | 3.03% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 8.43% | -2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 16.14% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 15.48% | -8.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.75% | 19.09% | -11.34% |