RIGS vs. SBIO
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO).
RIGS and SBIO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. SBIO is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network Medical Breakthroughs Index. It was launched on Dec 31, 2014.
Performance
RIGS vs. SBIO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIGS vs. SBIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.28% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 3.20% | 55.07% | 3.81% | 8.68% | -28.08% | -17.55% | 21.17% | 50.30% | -11.81% | 45.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGS achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than SBIO's 3.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGS has underperformed SBIO with an annualized return of 3.30%, while SBIO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
RIGS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
SBIO
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 36.23%
- 1Y
- 95.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIGS vs. SBIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIGS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIGS vs. SBIO — Risk / Return Rank
RIGS
SBIO
RIGS vs. SBIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) and ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGS | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 2.92 | -2.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 3.57 | -2.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.45 | -0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 5.66 | -4.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 19.94 | -18.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGS | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 2.92 | -2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.05 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.29 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.23 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGS and SBIO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RIGS vs. SBIO - Dividend Comparison
RIGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, while SBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
SBIO ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.55% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 2.79% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RIGS vs. SBIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGS drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum SBIO drawdown of -63.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGS and SBIO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGS | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -63.06% | +47.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -15.08% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.03% | -53.67% | +44.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -63.06% | +47.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -13.79% | +11.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -28.70% | +27.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 4.28% | -2.23% |
Volatility
RIGS vs. SBIO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is 2.20%, while ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that RIGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIGS | SBIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 12.61% | -10.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 22.09% | -15.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 33.43% | -23.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.47% | 33.55% | -26.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 33.34% | -25.60% |