PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RICGX vs. RLBGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RICGX vs. RLBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RICGX achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than RLBGX's 9.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RICGX has outperformed RLBGX with an annualized return of 14.65%, while RLBGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.


RICGX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.22%
YTD
10.42%
6M
10.16%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
24.51%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
14.65%

RLBGX

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.59%
YTD
9.55%
6M
10.20%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
17.78%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RICGX vs. RLBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RICGX
The Investment Company of America Class R-6
10.42%20.83%25.28%28.94%-15.24%25.49%14.48%24.88%-6.69%19.87%
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
9.55%18.83%15.35%13.92%-11.85%16.10%11.20%18.95%-3.07%14.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RICGX and RLBGX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.96

The correlation between RICGX and RLBGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RICGX vs. RLBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RICGX
RICGX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RICGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RICGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RICGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
RICGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RICGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RLBGX
RLBGX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RLBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RLBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RICGX vs. RLBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RICGXRLBGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.53

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.49

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

15.78

-4.03

RICGX vs. RLBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RICGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the RLBGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RICGX and RLBGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RICGXRLBGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.80

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.94

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.98

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.98

-0.07

Drawdowns

RICGX vs. RLBGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RICGX drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, which is greater than RLBGX's maximum drawdown of -22.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RICGX and RLBGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RICGXRLBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.06%

-22.33%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-6.98%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-10.65%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-18.59%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.06%

-22.33%

-8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.51%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-2.46%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

1.54%

+0.66%

Volatility

RICGX vs. RLBGX - Volatility Comparison

The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6 (RLBGX) at 2.67%. This indicates that RICGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RICGXRLBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

2.67%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

6.80%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

8.70%

+3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

10.49%

+5.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

10.67%

+5.91%

RICGX vs. RLBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RICGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than RLBGX's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RICGX vs. RLBGX - Dividend Comparison

RICGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.90%, more than RLBGX's 7.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RICGX
The Investment Company of America Class R-6
9.90%10.89%9.59%5.25%6.45%7.24%1.68%6.74%11.60%7.36%5.77%9.70%
RLBGX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class R-6
7.85%8.56%7.50%2.27%2.63%4.59%4.65%3.78%5.81%4.92%4.54%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RICGX and RLBGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RICGX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to RLBGX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RICGX dropped -31.06% vs RLBGX's -22.33%.

RLBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RICGX and RLBGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer