RICGX vs. QKACX
Compare and contrast key facts about The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX).
RICGX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Jan 1, 1934. QKACX is an actively managed fund by Federated Hermes. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002.
Performance
RICGX vs. QKACX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RICGX vs. QKACX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RICGX The Investment Company of America Class R-6 | -4.81% | 20.83% | 25.28% | 28.94% | -15.24% | 25.49% | 14.48% | 24.88% | -6.69% | 19.87% |
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 | -4.88% | 21.16% | 31.05% | 23.55% | -14.17% | 31.45% | 22.00% | 26.88% | -2.65% | 21.15% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RICGX having a -4.81% return and QKACX slightly lower at -4.88%. Over the past 10 years, RICGX has underperformed QKACX with an annualized return of 13.38%, while QKACX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
RICGX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -3.07%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
QKACX
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RICGX vs. QKACX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RICGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than QKACX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RICGX vs. QKACX — Risk / Return Rank
RICGX
QKACX
RICGX vs. QKACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RICGX | QKACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.15 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.67 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.55 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 7.54 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RICGX | QKACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.15 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.84 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.83 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.45 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between RICGX and QKACX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RICGX vs. QKACX - Dividend Comparison
RICGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.49%, more than QKACX's 4.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RICGX The Investment Company of America Class R-6 | 11.49% | 10.89% | 9.59% | 5.25% | 6.45% | 7.24% | 1.68% | 6.74% | 11.60% | 7.36% | 5.77% | 9.70% |
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 | 4.96% | 4.72% | 8.90% | 1.45% | 11.20% | 17.85% | 3.09% | 3.41% | 8.83% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.52% |
Drawdowns
RICGX vs. QKACX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RICGX drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum QKACX drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RICGX and QKACX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RICGX | QKACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.06% | -60.51% | +29.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.76% | -11.99% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.14% | -23.05% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.06% | -36.47% | +5.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.28% | -5.88% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -11.30% | +7.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.46% | +0.11% |
Volatility
RICGX vs. QKACX - Volatility Comparison
The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) at 5.40%. This indicates that RICGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QKACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RICGX | QKACX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 5.40% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 9.95% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 16.19% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 17.38% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 18.72% | -2.17% |