PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RICGX vs. AIVSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RICGX vs. AIVSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RICGX having a 11.01% return and AIVSX slightly lower at 10.91%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RICGX having a 14.77% annualized return and AIVSX not far behind at 14.27%.


RICGX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.90%
YTD
11.01%
6M
11.35%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
24.57%
5Y*
15.30%
10Y*
14.77%

AIVSX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.89%
YTD
10.91%
6M
11.20%
1Y
27.39%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RICGX vs. AIVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RICGX
The Investment Company of America Class R-6
11.01%20.83%25.28%28.94%-15.24%25.49%14.48%24.88%-6.69%19.87%
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
10.91%20.47%24.90%28.56%-15.50%25.10%14.47%24.10%-8.21%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RICGX and AIVSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009

1.00

The correlation between RICGX and AIVSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RICGX vs. AIVSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RICGX
RICGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RICGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RICGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RICGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RICGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
RICGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

AIVSX
AIVSX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AIVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AIVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RICGX vs. AIVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RICGXAIVSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

2.28

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

3.11

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.81

+0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.05

12.79

+0.26

RICGX vs. AIVSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RICGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the AIVSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RICGX and AIVSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RICGXAIVSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.28

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.94

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.86

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.70

+0.21

Drawdowns

RICGX vs. AIVSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RICGX drawdown since its inception was -31.06%, smaller than the maximum AIVSX drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RICGX and AIVSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RICGXAIVSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.06%

-50.90%

+19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.03%

-10.08%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-17.40%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.14%

-24.31%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.06%

-31.09%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-5.91%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.22%

-0.02%

Volatility

RICGX vs. AIVSX - Volatility Comparison

The Investment Company of America Class R-6 (RICGX) and American Funds Investment Company of America Class A (AIVSX) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RICGXAIVSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.25%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

9.73%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

12.48%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

16.00%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

16.58%

0.00%

RICGX vs. AIVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RICGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than AIVSX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

RICGX vs. AIVSX - Dividend Comparison

RICGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than AIVSX's 9.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIVSX
American Funds Investment Company of America Class A
9.58%10.60%9.29%4.96%6.12%6.94%1.65%6.15%9.61%7.08%5.48%8.95%
RICGX
The Investment Company of America Class R-6
9.85%10.89%9.59%5.25%6.45%7.24%1.68%6.74%11.60%7.36%5.77%9.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RICGX and AIVSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RICGX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to AIVSX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RICGX dropped -31.06% vs AIVSX's -50.90%.

RICGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RICGX and AIVSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer