RHRX vs. BSR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) and BSR (Beacon Selective Risk ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. RHRX is actively managed, while BSR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RHRX returned 21.00%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for BSR. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RHRX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BSR.

Performance

RHRX vs. BSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RHRX achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly higher than BSR's 2.77% return.

RHRX

• 1D: -2.79%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 18.02%
• 6M: 17.04%
• 1Y: 35.22%
• 3Y*: 21.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: 2.77%
• 6M: 2.04%
• 1Y: 10.43%
• 3Y*: 7.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RHRX vs. BSR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	18.02%	16.70%	22.21%	8.28%
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	2.77%	4.21%	12.44%	4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RHRX and BSR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2023	0.74

The correlation between RHRX and BSR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

RHRX vs. BSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RHRX	BSR
Technology	44.9%	12.1%
Industrials	12.9%	10.9%
Communication Services	8.4%	8.4%
Basic Materials	8.3%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	1.3%
Financial Services	6.8%	0.1%
Healthcare	5.1%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	11.0%
Energy	1.5%	11.9%
Utilities	1.1%	12.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	10.7%

Return for Risk

RHRX vs. BSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RHRX

RHRX Risk / Return Rank: 85
RHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
RHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
RHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

BSR

BSR Risk / Return Rank: 35
BSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BSR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
BSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BSR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RHRX vs. BSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) and Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RHRX	BSR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.19	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	1.67	+1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.21	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.18	1.70	+3.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.38	4.57	+14.81

RHRX vs. BSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the BSR Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RHRX and BSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RHRX vs. BSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RHRX drawdown since its inception was -25.33%, which is greater than BSR's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHRX and BSR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RHRX	BSR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.33%	-15.68%	-9.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-6.15%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.90%	-15.68%	-6.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.34%	-4.99%	+1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.87%	-4.58%	-4.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	2.29%	-0.47%

Volatility

RHRX vs. BSR - Volatility Comparison

RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Beacon Selective Risk ETF (BSR) at 2.41%. This indicates that RHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RHRX	BSR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	2.41%	+4.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	6.52%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.24%	8.79%	+5.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.12%	16.17%	+2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	16.17%	+2.95%

RHRX vs. BSR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RHRX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BSR's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RHRX vs. BSR - Dividend Comparison

RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BSR Beacon Selective Risk ETF	2.82%	2.89%	0.89%	1.08%
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RHRX and BSR in my portfolio?

RHRX and BSR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RHRX or BSR?

RHRX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to BSR (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHRX dropped -25.33% vs BSR's -15.68%.

Which ETF is better, RHRX or BSR?

On 3-year performance, RHRX leads with 21.00% vs 7.09% for BSR. On fees, BSR is cheaper at 1.10% per year. On volatility, BSR has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RHRX or BSR?

Over the 3-year period, RHRX has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RHRX or BSR?

BSR is cheaper with a 1.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RHRX or BSR?

BSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.

What is the main difference between RHRX and BSR?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and American Beacon. Their fees differ too: 1.36% for RHRX and 1.10% for BSR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.