RHI vs. AOA
RHI (Robert Half International Inc.) is a stock, while AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) is Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. Over the past 10 years, RHI returned 0.34%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for AOA. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RHI vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RHI achieves a 21.98% return, which is significantly higher than AOA's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, RHI has underperformed AOA with an annualized return of 0.34%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.
RHI
- 1D
- 6.90%
- 1M
- 20.39%
- YTD
- 21.98%
- 6M
- 23.57%
- 1Y
- -22.90%
- 3Y*
- -19.21%
- 5Y*
- -15.82%
- 10Y*
- 0.34%
AOA
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
RHI vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHI Robert Half International Inc. | 21.98% | -59.06% | -17.40% | 22.14% | -32.48% | 81.35% | 1.36% | 12.76% | 4.82% | 16.15% |
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 10.13% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 22.60% | -7.86% | 20.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between RHI and AOA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RHI and AOA has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RHI vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
RHI
AOA
RHI vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) and iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RHI | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.42 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.96 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 13.13 | -13.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RHI | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | 2.28 | -2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.71 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | 0.78 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.69 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
RHI vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RHI drawdown since its inception was -79.39%, which is greater than AOA's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHI and AOA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RHI | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.39% | -28.38% | -51.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.00% | -8.20% | -39.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.16% | -12.94% | -59.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.39% | -23.62% | -55.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.39% | -28.38% | -51.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.54% | -0.31% | -69.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -4.05% | -20.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.36% | 1.85% | +29.51% |
Volatility
RHI vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) has a higher volatility of 14.78% compared to iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 3.16%. This indicates that RHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RHI | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.78% | 3.16% | +11.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.01% | 8.51% | +35.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.40% | 10.63% | +41.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.63% | 12.97% | +22.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.52% | 13.54% | +20.98% |
Dividends
RHI vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
RHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than AOA's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.04% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
RHI Robert Half International Inc. | 7.47% | 8.69% | 3.01% | 2.18% | 2.33% | 1.36% | 2.18% | 1.96% | 1.96% | 1.73% | 1.80% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RHI and AOA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RHI has higher volatility (14.78%) compared to AOA (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHI dropped -79.39% vs AOA's -28.38%.
AOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RHI and AOA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer