RHI vs. MIAGX
RHI (Robert Half International Inc.) is a stock, while MIAGX (MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund) is Diversified Portfolio fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, RHI returned 1.93%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for MIAGX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RHI vs. MIAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RHI achieves a 37.38% return, which is significantly higher than MIAGX's 9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RHI has underperformed MIAGX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while MIAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.
RHI
- 1D
- 9.85%
- 1M
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 28.40%
- YTD
- 37.38%
- 1Y
- -7.90%
- 3Y*
- -20.62%
- 5Y*
- -13.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
MIAGX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
RHI vs. MIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHI Robert Half International Inc. | 37.38% | -59.06% | -17.40% | 22.14% | -32.48% | 81.35% | 1.36% | 12.76% | 4.82% | 16.15% |
MIAGX MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund | 9.12% | 15.20% | 12.11% | 16.29% | -16.94% | 19.16% | 15.81% | 29.98% | -6.72% | 23.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RHI and MIAGX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2002 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RHI and MIAGX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RHI vs. MIAGX — Risk / Return Rank
RHI
MIAGX
RHI vs. MIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) and MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RHI | MIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.23 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.66 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 6.87 | -7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RHI vs. MIAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RHI drawdown since its inception was -79.39%, which is greater than MIAGX's maximum drawdown of -55.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHI and MIAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RHI | MIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.39% | -55.00% | -24.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.45% | -8.65% | -36.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.16% | -14.88% | -57.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.39% | -25.51% | -53.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.39% | -32.78% | -46.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.69% | -0.51% | -65.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -6.79% | -18.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | 2.08% | +26.99% |
Volatility
RHI vs. MIAGX - Volatility Comparison
Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) has a higher volatility of 19.79% compared to MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund (MIAGX) at 3.76%. This indicates that RHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RHI | MIAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.79% | 3.76% | +16.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.63% | 9.06% | +38.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.33% | 11.31% | +44.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 14.56% | +22.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.86% | 15.37% | +19.49% |
Dividends
RHI vs. MIAGX - Dividend Comparison
RHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than MIAGX's 7.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIAGX MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund | 7.17% | 7.82% | 5.16% | 3.41% | 4.49% | 6.84% | 3.69% | 4.80% | 6.06% | 4.25% | 3.12% | 5.45% |
RHI Robert Half International Inc. | 6.63% | 8.69% | 3.01% | 2.18% | 2.33% | 1.36% | 2.18% | 1.96% | 1.96% | 1.73% | 1.80% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RHI and MIAGX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RHI has higher volatility (19.79%) compared to MIAGX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHI dropped -79.39% vs MIAGX's -55.00%.
MIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RHI and MIAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer