RHI vs. TMAAX
RHI (Robert Half International Inc.) is a stock, while TMAAX (Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A) is Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, RHI returned 1.93%/yr vs 9.71%/yr for TMAAX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RHI vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RHI achieves a 37.38% return, which is significantly higher than TMAAX's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, RHI has underperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.71% annualized return.
RHI
- 1D
- 9.85%
- 1M
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 28.40%
- YTD
- 37.38%
- 1Y
- -7.90%
- 3Y*
- -20.62%
- 5Y*
- -13.22%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
TMAAX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 17.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
RHI vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHI Robert Half International Inc. | 37.38% | -59.06% | -17.40% | 22.14% | -32.48% | 81.35% | 1.36% | 12.76% | 4.82% | 16.15% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 9.25% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between RHI and TMAAX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2005 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RHI and TMAAX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RHI vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank
RHI
TMAAX
RHI vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RHI | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.30 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 2.32 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 10.07 | -10.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RHI vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RHI drawdown since its inception was -79.39%, which is greater than TMAAX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RHI and TMAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RHI | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.39% | -50.54% | -28.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.45% | -7.55% | -37.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -72.16% | -14.37% | -57.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.39% | -26.55% | -52.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.39% | -26.99% | -52.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.69% | 0.00% | -65.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -7.32% | -17.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.07% | 1.74% | +27.33% |
Volatility
RHI vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison
Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) has a higher volatility of 19.79% compared to Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) at 3.69%. This indicates that RHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RHI | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.79% | 3.69% | +16.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.63% | 8.69% | +38.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.33% | 10.68% | +44.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 13.98% | +22.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.86% | 13.27% | +21.59% |
Dividends
RHI vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison
RHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, which matches TMAAX's 6.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RHI Robert Half International Inc. | 6.63% | 8.69% | 3.01% | 2.18% | 2.33% | 1.36% | 2.18% | 1.96% | 1.96% | 1.73% | 1.80% | 1.70% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 6.67% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RHI and TMAAX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RHI has higher volatility (19.79%) compared to TMAAX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RHI dropped -79.39% vs TMAAX's -50.54%.
TMAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RHI and TMAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer