RH vs. AORT
RH (RH) and AORT (Artivion, Inc.) are both stocks. RH operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while AORT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, RH returned 19.13%/yr vs 6.53%/yr for AORT. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RH vs. AORT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RH achieves a -7.61% return, which is significantly higher than AORT's -41.18% return. Over the past 10 years, RH has outperformed AORT with an annualized return of 19.13%, while AORT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.53% annualized return.
RH
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -16.75%
- YTD
- -7.61%
- 1Y
- -17.55%
- 3Y*
- -24.87%
- 5Y*
- -24.26%
- 10Y*
- 19.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.69%
AORT
- 1D
- -3.04%
- 1M
- 11.93%
- 6M
- -34.19%
- YTD
- -41.18%
- 1Y
- -13.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- -0.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AORT Artivion, Inc. | $14.19M | $13.80M | $19.20M |
RH RH | $121.46M | $130.86M | $136.75M |
RH vs. AORT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH RH | -7.61% | -54.48% | 35.03% | 9.09% | -50.15% | 19.76% | 109.61% | 78.18% | 38.99% | 180.81% |
AORT Artivion, Inc. | -41.18% | 59.53% | 59.90% | 47.52% | -40.44% | -13.81% | -12.85% | -4.55% | 48.20% | -0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RH and AORT is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2012 | 0.26 |
The correlation between RH and AORT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RH:
$3.13B
AORT:
$1.30B
RH:
$5.28
AORT:
$0.24
RH:
31.36
AORT:
113.31
RH:
0.94
AORT:
2.89
RH:
54.79
AORT:
2.96
RH:
$3.43B
AORT:
$458.69M
RH:
$1.49B
AORT:
$292.61M
RH:
$440.85M
AORT:
$53.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RH vs. AORT — Risk / Return Rank
RH
AORT
RH vs. AORT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH (RH) and Artivion, Inc. (AORT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RH | AORT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.00 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | -0.23 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | -0.48 | -0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RH vs. AORT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RH drawdown since its inception was -84.72%, smaller than the maximum AORT drawdown of -95.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RH and AORT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RH | AORT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.72% | -95.72% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.04% | -57.80% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.17% | -57.80% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.72% | -63.35% | -21.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.72% | -72.00% | -12.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.59% | -43.67% | -33.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.46% | -56.95% | +21.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.23% | 27.69% | +5.54% |
Volatility
RH vs. AORT - Volatility Comparison
RH (RH) has a higher volatility of 17.32% compared to Artivion, Inc. (AORT) at 12.25%. This indicates that RH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AORT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RH | AORT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.32% | 12.25% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.86% | 46.40% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.02% | 53.64% | +8.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.12% | 45.47% | +16.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.08% | 44.84% | +19.24% |
Dividends
RH vs. AORT - Dividend Comparison
Neither RH nor AORT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AORT Artivion, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.11% |
RH RH | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RH vs. AORT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RH and Artivion, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RH vs. AORT - Profitability Comparison
RH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported a gross profit of 331.26M and revenue of 800.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.
AORT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported a gross profit of 75.45M and revenue of 116.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.9%.
RH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported an operating income of 34.24M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
AORT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.79M and revenue of 116.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.
RH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RH reported a net income of -13.70M and revenue of 800.33M, resulting in a net margin of -1.7%.
AORT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported a net income of 1.42M and revenue of 116.34M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RH and AORT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RH has higher volatility (17.32%) compared to AORT (12.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RH dropped -84.72% vs AORT's -95.72%.
AORT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.25 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RH and AORT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer