PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AORT vs. ATEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AORT vs. ATEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artivion, Inc. (AORT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AORT achieves a -54.66% return, which is significantly lower than ATEN's 92.33% return. Over the past 10 years, AORT has underperformed ATEN with an annualized return of 6.00%, while ATEN has yielded a comparatively higher 19.05% annualized return.


AORT

1D
2.73%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
-54.66%
6M
-56.17%
1Y
-32.97%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
-6.78%
10Y*
6.00%

ATEN

1D
0.24%
1M
16.08%
YTD
92.33%
6M
89.02%
1Y
88.03%
3Y*
34.55%
5Y*
27.34%
10Y*
19.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AORT vs. ATEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AORT
Artivion, Inc.
-54.66%59.53%59.90%47.52%-40.44%-13.81%-12.85%-4.55%48.20%-0.00%
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
92.33%-2.59%42.08%-19.43%1.70%68.66%43.52%10.10%-19.17%-7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AORT and ATEN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between AORT and ATEN has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AORT:

$1.03B

ATEN:

$2.47B

EPS

AORT:

$0.24

ATEN:

$0.61

PE Ratio

AORT:

85.57

ATEN:

55.33

PS Ratio

AORT:

2.18

ATEN:

8.25

PB Ratio

AORT:

2.28

ATEN:

11.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

AORT:

$458.69M

ATEN:

$299.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AORT:

$292.61M

ATEN:

$237.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

AORT:

$53.91M

ATEN:

$67.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AORT vs. ATEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AORT
AORT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
AORT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AORT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AORT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AORT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AORT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ATEN
ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AORT vs. ATEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artivion, Inc. (AORT) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AORTATENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.42

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

5.13

-5.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

9.72

-11.17

AORT vs. ATEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AORT Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the ATEN Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AORT and ATEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AORT vs. ATEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AORT drawdown since its inception was -95.72%, which is greater than ATEN's maximum drawdown of -78.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AORT and ATEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AORTATENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.72%

-78.29%

-17.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.80%

-17.26%

-40.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.80%

-32.14%

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.70%

-43.87%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.00%

-67.32%

-4.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.58%

0.00%

-56.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.98%

-40.09%

-16.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.73%

9.09%

+13.64%

Volatility

AORT vs. ATEN - Volatility Comparison

Artivion, Inc. (AORT) has a higher volatility of 12.32% compared to A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) at 10.53%. This indicates that AORT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AORTATENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.32%

10.53%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.63%

25.27%

+18.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.74%

32.49%

+19.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.04%

42.29%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.82%

43.12%

+1.70%

Dividends

AORT vs. ATEN - Dividend Comparison

AORT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AORT
Artivion, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.11%
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
0.71%1.36%1.30%1.82%1.26%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AORT vs. ATEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Artivion, Inc. and A10 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M60.00M70.00M80.00M90.00M100.00M110.00M120.00M20222023202420252026
116.34M
75.00M
(AORT) Total Revenue
(ATEN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AORT vs. ATEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Artivion, Inc. and A10 Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
64.9%
79.6%
Portfolio components
AORT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported a gross profit of 75.45M and revenue of 116.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.9%.

ATEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.72M and revenue of 75.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

AORT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.79M and revenue of 116.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

ATEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.00M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

AORT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artivion, Inc. reported a net income of 1.42M and revenue of 116.34M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.

ATEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 12.03M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AORT and ATEN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AORT has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to ATEN (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AORT dropped -95.72% vs ATEN's -78.29%.

ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AORT and ATEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer