RGTX vs. RING

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RGTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. RGTX is actively managed, while RING is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTX returned -38.90% vs 51.23% for RING. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.

Performance

RGTX vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -65.29% return, which is significantly lower than RING's -11.05% return.

RGTX

• 1D: -12.00%
• 1M: -53.67%
• YTD: -65.29%
• 6M: -72.18%
• 1Y: -38.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RING

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: -15.03%
• YTD: -11.05%
• 6M: -14.98%
• 1Y: 51.23%
• 3Y*: 43.01%
• 5Y*: 20.15%
• 10Y*: 12.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTX vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF	-65.29%	162.83%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	-11.05%	93.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTX and RING is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	0.16

RGTX vs. RING - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RGTX	RING
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	99.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RGTX vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTX

RGTX Risk / Return Rank: 14
RGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
RGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 31
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTX vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTX	RING	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	1.07	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.50	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.20	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.40	1.44	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.52	3.74	-4.26

RGTX vs. RING - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the RING Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTX and RING, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGTX vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTX	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.33%	-79.47%	-17.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.33%	-35.72%	-61.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.41%	-34.11%	-62.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.80%	-47.32%	-9.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.46%	13.75%	+60.71%

Volatility

RGTX vs. RING - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 64.25% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 17.15%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGTX	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	64.25%	17.15%	+47.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	140.17%	39.93%	+100.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	218.82%	48.18%	+170.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	222.94%	37.00%	+185.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	222.94%	36.74%	+186.20%

RGTX vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTX vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than RING's 1.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF	1.57%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	1.39%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTX and RING in my portfolio?

RGTX and RING have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGTX or RING?

RGTX has higher volatility (64.25%) compared to RING (17.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs RING's -79.47%.

Which ETF is better, RGTX or RING?

On 1-year performance, RING leads with 51.23% vs -38.90% for RGTX. On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RING has been the lower-risk option at 17.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGTX or RING?

Over the 1-year period, RING has performed better with a 51.23% return vs -38.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTX or RING?

RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTX or RING?

RGTX has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.39% for RING.

What is the main difference between RGTX and RING?

RGTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RING is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.39% for RING.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.