RGTX vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RGTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RGTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. RGTX is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Over the past year, RGTX returned -35.84% vs 79.32% for QTUM. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

RGTX vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -60.56% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 46.10% return.

RGTX

• 1D: -16.54%
• 1M: -52.99%
• YTD: -60.56%
• 6M: -68.38%
• 1Y: -35.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 46.10%
• 6M: 43.67%
• 1Y: 79.32%
• 3Y*: 50.12%
• 5Y*: 27.79%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTX vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF	-60.56%	162.83%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	46.10%	48.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTX and QTUM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2025	0.66

The correlation between RGTX and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

RGTX vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RGTX	QTUM
Technology	100.0%	81.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	1.0%
Industrials	-	8.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RGTX vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTX

RGTX Risk / Return Rank: 14
RGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
RGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
RGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
RGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 87
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTX vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RGTX	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.16	2.74	-2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	3.26	-1.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.43	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	5.23	-5.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	18.77	-19.26

RGTX vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTX and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RGTX vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTX	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.33%	-38.45%	-58.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-97.33%	-15.26%	-82.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.92%	-5.26%	-90.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.67%	-8.22%	-48.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	74.22%	4.24%	+69.98%

Volatility

RGTX vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 64.06% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 14.90%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGTX	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	64.06%	14.90%	+49.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	141.79%	23.76%	+118.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	218.75%	29.19%	+189.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	223.00%	27.18%	+195.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	223.00%	27.48%	+195.52%

RGTX vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

RGTX vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than QTUM's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.73%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF	1.38%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RGTX and QTUM in my portfolio?

RGTX and QTUM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RGTX or QTUM?

RGTX has higher volatility (64.06%) compared to QTUM (14.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, RGTX or QTUM?

On 1-year performance, QTUM leads with 79.32% vs -35.84% for RGTX. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 14.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RGTX or QTUM?

Over the 1-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 79.32% return vs -35.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RGTX or QTUM?

QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RGTX or QTUM?

RGTX has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.73% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between RGTX and QTUM?

RGTX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.