PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTX vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTX vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -33.35% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -60.40% return.


RGTX

1D
-20.63%
1M
51.50%
YTD
-33.35%
6M
-56.81%
1Y
-6.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOG

1D
-12.13%
1M
10.59%
YTD
-60.40%
6M
-72.73%
1Y
-29.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTX vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGTX and HOOG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.49

The correlation between RGTX and HOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTX vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTX
RGTX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTX vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGTXHOOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.03

-0.22

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

0.64

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.07

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

-0.34

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.09

-0.55

+0.46

RGTX vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is higher than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTX and HOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGTXHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

-0.22

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.31

-0.05

Drawdowns

RGTX vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than HOOG's maximum drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and HOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTXHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.33%

-86.94%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.33%

-86.94%

-10.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.10%

-81.53%

-11.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.03%

-37.56%

-17.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.91%

53.22%

+17.69%

Volatility

RGTX vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 83.08% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) at 41.51%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTXHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

83.08%

41.51%

+41.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

139.30%

100.64%

+38.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

215.89%

137.15%

+78.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

223.72%

144.88%

+78.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

223.72%

144.88%

+78.84%

RGTX vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTX vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than HOOG's 31.07% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RGTX and HOOG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTX has higher volatility (83.08%) compared to HOOG (41.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs HOOG's -86.94%.

On 1-year performance, RGTX leads with -6.41% vs -29.31% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HOOG has been the lower-risk option at 41.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RGTX has performed better with a -6.41% return vs -29.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.

HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.07%, compared with 0.82% for RGTX.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.75% for HOOG.

RGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTX and HOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer