RGTX vs. HOOG
RGTX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF) and HOOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RGTX returned -6.41% vs -29.31% for HOOG. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RGTX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HOOG.
Performance
RGTX vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGTX achieves a -33.35% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -60.40% return.
RGTX
- 1D
- -20.63%
- 1M
- 51.50%
- YTD
- -33.35%
- 6M
- -56.81%
- 1Y
- -6.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOG
- 1D
- -12.13%
- 1M
- 10.59%
- YTD
- -60.40%
- 6M
- -72.73%
- 1Y
- -29.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RGTX vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | -33.35% | 153.12% |
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | -60.40% | 343.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGTX and HOOG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.49 |
The correlation between RGTX and HOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGTX vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank
RGTX
HOOG
RGTX vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGTX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | -0.22 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 0.64 | +1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | -0.34 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | -0.55 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGTX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | -0.22 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.31 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
RGTX vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGTX drawdown since its inception was -97.33%, which is greater than HOOG's maximum drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTX and HOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGTX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.33% | -86.94% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.33% | -86.94% | -10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.10% | -81.53% | -11.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -37.56% | -17.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.91% | 53.22% | +17.69% |
Volatility
RGTX vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF (RGTX) has a higher volatility of 83.08% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) at 41.51%. This indicates that RGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGTX | HOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 83.08% | 41.51% | +41.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 139.30% | 100.64% | +38.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.89% | 137.15% | +78.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 144.88% | +78.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 223.72% | 144.88% | +78.84% |
RGTX vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGTX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGTX vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison
RGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than HOOG's 31.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF | 31.07% | 12.30% |
RGTX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF | 0.82% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGTX and HOOG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTX has higher volatility (83.08%) compared to HOOG (41.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTX dropped -97.33% vs HOOG's -86.94%.
On 1-year performance, RGTX leads with -6.41% vs -29.31% for HOOG. On fees, HOOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HOOG has been the lower-risk option at 41.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RGTX has performed better with a -6.41% return vs -29.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HOOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RGTX.
HOOG has the higher dividend yield at 31.07%, compared with 0.82% for RGTX.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RGTX and 0.75% for HOOG.
RGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.03 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGTX and HOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer