PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTU vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTU vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTU achieves a -61.02% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 41.97% return.


RGTU

1D
-11.74%
1M
-51.89%
YTD
-61.02%
6M
-68.54%
1Y
-24.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GUSH

1D
1.98%
1M
-13.40%
YTD
41.97%
6M
42.23%
1Y
37.49%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
-35.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTU vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and GUSH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTU vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTU
RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTU vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGTUGUSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

1.04

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

2.66

-2.99

RGTU vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTU and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, roughly equal to the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and GUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTUGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.96%

-99.98%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.96%

-36.18%

-60.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.64%

-99.83%

+4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.86%

-92.92%

+29.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

73.82%

14.11%

+59.71%

Volatility

RGTU vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) has a higher volatility of 64.59% compared to Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) at 16.93%. This indicates that RGTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTUGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

64.59%

16.93%

+47.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

140.29%

44.19%

+96.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

219.46%

56.17%

+163.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

219.07%

68.19%

+150.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

219.07%

93.40%

+125.67%

RGTU vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGTU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGTU vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.92%, more than GUSH's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.54%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%
RGTU
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
52.92%20.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTU and GUSH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTU has higher volatility (64.59%) compared to GUSH (16.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTU dropped -96.96% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

On 1-year performance, GUSH leads with 37.49% vs -24.32% for RGTU. On fees, GUSH is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, GUSH has been the lower-risk option at 16.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs -24.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GUSH is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for RGTU.

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 52.92%, compared with 1.54% for GUSH.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for RGTU and 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTU and GUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer