PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTU vs. ARCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGTU vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RGTU having a -76.61% return and ARCX slightly higher at -73.15%.


RGTU

1D
1.46%
1M
-36.13%
6M
-62.74%
YTD
-76.61%
1Y
-68.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-52.05%

ARCX

1D
-4.08%
1M
-18.30%
6M
-69.54%
YTD
-73.15%
1Y
-87.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-89.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$474.65K$398.88K$951.49K
$1.69M$1.58M$6.01M

RGTU vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RGTU
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
-76.61%90.43%
ARCX
Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF
-73.15%-61.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTU and ARCX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.67

The correlation between RGTU and ARCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTU vs. ARCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGTU
RGTU Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
RGTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTU Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCX
ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGTU vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGTUARCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.87

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.95

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

-1.25

+0.37

RGTU vs. ARCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the ARCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTU and ARCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGTU vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTU drawdown since its inception was -97.93%, roughly equal to the maximum ARCX drawdown of -94.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTU and ARCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTUARCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.93%

-94.32%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.93%

-93.63%

-4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.39%

-93.90%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.82%

-68.07%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

79.64%

70.97%

+8.67%

Volatility

RGTU vs. ARCX - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF (RGTU) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX) have volatilities of 54.17% and 53.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTUARCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.17%

53.50%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

143.29%

97.81%

+45.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

213.12%

140.02%

+73.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

215.68%

144.59%

+71.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

215.68%

144.59%

+71.09%

RGTU vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RGTU and ARCX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

RGTU vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison

RGTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.22%, while ARCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
ARCX
Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%
RGTU
Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF
88.22%20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTU and ARCX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTU has higher volatility (54.17%) compared to ARCX (53.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTU dropped -97.93% vs ARCX's -94.32%.

On 1-year performance, RGTU leads with -68.03% vs -87.73% for ARCX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, ARCX has been the lower-risk option at 53.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RGTU has performed better with a -68.03% return vs -87.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RGTU and ARCX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

RGTU has the higher dividend yield at 88.22%, compared with 0.00% for ARCX.

RGTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTU and ARCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer