RGSVX vs. LMASX
RGSVX (ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund) and LMASX (ClearBridge Small Cap Fund) are both mutual funds - RGSVX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while LMASX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 5 years, RGSVX returned 8.95%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for LMASX. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RGSVX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for LMASX.
Performance
RGSVX vs. LMASX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGSVX achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than LMASX's 10.66% return.
RGSVX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 11.59%
- 1Y
- 20.73%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
LMASX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 26.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
RGSVX vs. LMASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGSVX ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 12.29% | 26.02% | 2.19% | 3.64% | -5.85% | 12.09% | 12.33% | 26.21% | -7.94% | 17.05% |
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 10.66% | 5.38% | 6.61% | 16.09% | -21.19% | 17.67% | 2.44% | 29.75% | -9.81% | 10.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGSVX and LMASX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017 | 0.55 |
The correlation between RGSVX and LMASX shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGSVX vs. LMASX — Risk / Return Rank
RGSVX
LMASX
RGSVX vs. LMASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGSVX | LMASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.28 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 2.82 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 8.92 | +1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGSVX | LMASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.65 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.11 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.44 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
RGSVX vs. LMASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGSVX drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum LMASX drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGSVX and LMASX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGSVX | LMASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.19% | -69.22% | +34.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.49% | -10.05% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -26.38% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | -30.07% | +5.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -0.84% | -2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -10.45% | +4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 3.17% | -1.19% |
Volatility
RGSVX vs. LMASX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) is 3.73%, while ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that RGSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGSVX | LMASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 4.31% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 11.78% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.29% | 17.18% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 20.98% | -6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 22.56% | -6.92% |
RGSVX vs. LMASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGSVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than LMASX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
RGSVX vs. LMASX - Dividend Comparison
RGSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than LMASX's 10.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 10.72% | 11.86% | 6.98% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 18.14% | 0.05% | 4.15% | 13.81% | 6.78% | 3.35% | 5.67% |
RGSVX ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund | 2.76% | 3.00% | 4.04% | 4.78% | 4.90% | 4.65% | 3.79% | 2.99% | 2.79% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RGSVX and LMASX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMASX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to RGSVX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGSVX dropped -35.19% vs LMASX's -69.22%.
RGSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGSVX and LMASX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer