LMASX vs. LCSMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LMASX (ClearBridge Small Cap Fund) and LCSMX (Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund) are both mutual funds - LMASX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while LCSMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 5 years, LMASX returned 3.07%/yr vs 13.05%/yr for LCSMX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMASX charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LCSMX.

Performance

LMASX vs. LCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMASX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly lower than LCSMX's 70.59% return.

LMASX

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 9.92%
• 5Y*: 3.07%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

LCSMX

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 70.59%
• 6M: 78.21%
• 1Y: 131.44%
• 3Y*: 31.04%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMASX vs. LCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund	12.65%	5.38%	6.61%	16.09%	-21.19%	17.67%	2.44%	29.75%	-11.28%
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund	70.59%	51.52%	-13.60%	16.26%	-27.25%	4.73%	35.72%	6.81%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LMASX and LCSMX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018	0.50

The correlation between LMASX and LCSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LMASX vs. LCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMASX

LMASX Risk / Return Rank: 41
LMASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LMASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
LMASX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
LMASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
LMASX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

LCSMX

LCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 97
LCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
LCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
LCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMASX vs. LCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LMASX	LCSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	4.51	-2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	4.57	-2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.78	-0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	8.59	-5.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.77	31.02	-22.25

LMASX vs. LCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the LCSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMASX and LCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LMASX vs. LCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMASX drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than LCSMX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMASX and LCSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LMASX	LCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.22%	-39.72%	-29.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.05%	-15.39%	+5.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.38%	-23.31%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.07%	-39.72%	+9.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.35%	0.00%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.44%	-13.68%	+3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	4.25%	-1.09%

Volatility

LMASX vs. LCSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) is 4.67%, while Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) has a volatility of 17.18%. This indicates that LMASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LMASX	LCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.67%	17.18%	-12.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.85%	27.15%	-15.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.28%	29.33%	-12.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.01%	20.36%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.57%	20.63%	+1.94%

LMASX vs. LCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMASX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

LMASX vs. LCSMX - Dividend Comparison

LMASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than LCSMX's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund	0.58%	1.00%	1.29%	1.22%	1.11%	3.03%	0.48%	0.88%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund	10.53%	11.86%	6.98%	1.81%	0.00%	18.14%	0.05%	4.15%	13.81%	6.78%	3.35%	5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LMASX and LCSMX in my portfolio?

LMASX and LCSMX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LMASX or LCSMX?

LCSMX has higher volatility (17.18%) compared to LMASX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMASX dropped -69.22% vs LCSMX's -39.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.