LMASX vs. LMISX
LMASX (ClearBridge Small Cap Fund) and LMISX (Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - LMASX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Legg Mason, while LMISX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Legg Mason. Over the past 10 years, LMASX returned 7.85%/yr vs 15.33%/yr for LMISX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LMASX charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LMISX.
Performance
LMASX vs. LMISX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMASX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than LMISX's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LMASX has underperformed LMISX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while LMISX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.33% annualized return.
LMASX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 9.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
LMISX
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 10.11%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 29.79%
- 3Y*
- 23.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.33%
LMASX vs. LMISX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 12.65% | 5.38% | 6.61% | 16.09% | -21.19% | 17.67% | 2.44% | 29.75% | -9.81% | 10.94% |
LMISX Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund | 10.11% | 18.05% | 29.58% | 27.88% | -20.61% | 31.69% | 17.20% | 25.95% | -7.57% | 23.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMASX and LMISX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2008 | 0.85 |
The correlation between LMASX and LMISX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMASX vs. LMISX — Risk / Return Rank
LMASX
LMISX
LMASX vs. LMISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LMASX | LMISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.42 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.41 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | 15.51 | -6.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LMASX vs. LMISX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMASX drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than LMISX's maximum drawdown of -50.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMASX and LMISX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMASX | LMISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.22% | -50.34% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -8.69% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.38% | -20.22% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -26.11% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.13% | -35.27% | -11.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.93% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.44% | -7.60% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 1.91% | +1.25% |
Volatility
LMASX vs. LMISX - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund (LMISX) have volatilities of 4.67% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMASX | LMISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 4.91% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.85% | 9.89% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.28% | 12.55% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 17.76% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 18.82% | +3.75% |
LMASX vs. LMISX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMASX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LMISX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMASX vs. LMISX - Dividend Comparison
LMASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than LMISX's 5.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 10.53% | 11.86% | 6.98% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 18.14% | 0.05% | 4.15% | 13.81% | 6.78% | 3.35% | 5.67% |
LMISX Franklin U.S. Large Cap Equity Fund | 5.35% | 4.11% | 3.97% | 7.68% | 0.95% | 25.55% | 3.53% | 8.42% | 17.16% | 6.53% | 1.42% | 6.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMASX and LMISX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMISX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to LMASX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMASX dropped -69.22% vs LMISX's -50.34%.
LMISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LMASX and LMISX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer