LMASX vs. LCILX
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX).
LMASX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985. LCILX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Mar 31, 2015.
Performance
LMASX vs. LCILX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LMASX vs. LCILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | -2.08% | 5.38% | 6.61% | 16.09% | -21.19% | 17.67% | 2.44% | 29.75% | -9.81% | 10.94% |
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund | -5.98% | 10.49% | 14.36% | 16.68% | -20.85% | 24.76% | 35.82% | 37.85% | -2.40% | 21.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMASX achieves a -2.08% return, which is significantly higher than LCILX's -5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, LMASX has underperformed LCILX with an annualized return of 7.04%, while LCILX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
LMASX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -2.08%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- 10.21%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
LCILX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -7.96%
- YTD
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- 5.47%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LMASX vs. LCILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMASX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LCILX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LMASX vs. LCILX — Risk / Return Rank
LMASX
LCILX
LMASX vs. LCILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMASX | LCILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.66 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.08 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.16 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 0.83 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 3.80 | -1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMASX | LCILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.66 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.32 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.69 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.68 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between LMASX and LCILX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LMASX vs. LCILX - Dividend Comparison
LMASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.11%, more than LCILX's 5.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMASX ClearBridge Small Cap Fund | 12.11% | 11.86% | 6.98% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 18.14% | 0.05% | 4.15% | 13.81% | 6.78% | 3.35% | 5.67% |
LCILX ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund | 5.18% | 4.87% | 6.02% | 0.75% | 0.42% | 1.42% | 4.18% | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.73% | 0.80% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LMASX vs. LCILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMASX drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, which is greater than LCILX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMASX and LCILX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMASX | LCILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.22% | -31.70% | -37.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -11.20% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -27.19% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.13% | -31.70% | -15.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.44% | -8.74% | -0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -5.36% | -5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 2.44% | +1.54% |
Volatility
LMASX vs. LCILX - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) at 4.24%. This indicates that LMASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LMASX | LCILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 4.24% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 8.74% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.12% | 17.38% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 17.29% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 18.11% | +4.42% |