PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGSVX vs. LCILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RGSVX vs. LCILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGSVX achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly higher than LCILX's 9.23% return.


RGSVX

1D
1.27%
1M
0.54%
6M
7.30%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.74%

LCILX

1D
1.32%
1M
-1.35%
6M
8.24%
YTD
9.23%
1Y
16.13%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
13.91%
ALL TIME*
13.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RGSVX vs. LCILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RGSVX
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund
13.05%26.02%2.19%3.64%-5.85%12.09%12.33%26.21%-7.94%17.05%
LCILX
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund
9.23%10.49%14.36%16.68%-20.85%24.76%35.82%37.85%-2.40%21.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RGSVX and LCILX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.58

The correlation between RGSVX and LCILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGSVX vs. LCILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RGSVX
RGSVX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RGSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RGSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LCILX
LCILX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LCILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCILX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LCILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCILX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RGSVX vs. LCILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RGSVXLCILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.20

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.59

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.93

6.80

+2.13

RGSVX vs. LCILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the LCILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGSVX and LCILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RGSVX vs. LCILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGSVX drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, which is greater than LCILX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGSVX and LCILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGSVXLCILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.19%

-31.70%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-8.74%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.38%

-19.63%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-27.19%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-2.09%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-5.22%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.04%

+0.25%

Volatility

RGSVX vs. LCILX - Volatility Comparison

ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund (RGSVX) and ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund (LCILX) have volatilities of 3.15% and 3.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGSVXLCILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

3.15%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

9.80%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

12.55%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

17.37%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

18.11%

-2.54%

RGSVX vs. LCILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RGSVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LCILX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RGSVX vs. LCILX - Dividend Comparison

RGSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than LCILX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LCILX
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders Fund
4.46%4.87%6.02%0.75%0.42%1.42%4.18%0.61%0.56%0.73%0.80%
RGSVX
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Income Fund
3.21%3.00%4.04%4.78%4.90%4.65%3.79%2.99%2.79%2.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RGSVX and LCILX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCILX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to RGSVX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGSVX dropped -35.19% vs LCILX's -31.70%.

RGSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGSVX and LCILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer