PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMASX vs. LMGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMASX vs. LMGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMASX achieves a 12.65% return, which is significantly higher than LMGTX's 8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, LMASX has underperformed LMGTX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while LMGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.60% annualized return.


LMASX

1D
1.03%
1M
3.64%
YTD
12.65%
6M
9.09%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
9.92%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
7.85%

LMGTX

1D
2.05%
1M
5.08%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.35%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
9.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMASX vs. LMGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMASX
ClearBridge Small Cap Fund
12.65%5.38%6.61%16.09%-21.19%17.67%2.44%29.75%-9.81%10.94%
LMGTX
ClearBridge International Growth Fund
8.45%21.83%6.39%13.17%-21.97%2.93%23.55%30.01%-10.28%35.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LMASX and LMGTX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 1995

0.77

The correlation between LMASX and LMGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMASX vs. LMGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMASX
LMASX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LMASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMASX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LMASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMASX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

LMGTX
LMGTX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
LMGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LMGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMASX vs. LMGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) and ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMASXLMGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.25

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

4.48

+4.30

LMASX vs. LMGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the LMGTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMASX and LMGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMASX vs. LMGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMASX drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, roughly equal to the maximum LMGTX drawdown of -71.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMASX and LMGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMASXLMGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.22%

-71.47%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.05%

-13.71%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.38%

-14.53%

-11.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-35.65%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.13%

-35.65%

-11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

0.00%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.44%

-16.47%

+6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.82%

-0.66%

Volatility

LMASX vs. LMGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Small Cap Fund (LMASX) is 4.67%, while ClearBridge International Growth Fund (LMGTX) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that LMASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMASXLMGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

7.59%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

16.23%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.28%

18.78%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.01%

17.98%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.57%

17.46%

+5.11%

LMASX vs. LMGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMASX has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LMGTX's 1.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMASX vs. LMGTX - Dividend Comparison

LMASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than LMGTX's 7.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMASX
ClearBridge Small Cap Fund
10.53%11.86%6.98%1.81%0.00%18.14%0.05%4.15%13.81%6.78%3.35%5.67%
LMGTX
ClearBridge International Growth Fund
7.20%7.81%0.54%0.48%0.07%2.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMASX and LMGTX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LMGTX has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to LMASX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMASX dropped -69.22% vs LMGTX's -71.47%.

LMASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMASX and LMGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer