RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE).
RGPM.NEO and 8PSG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RGPM.NEO is an actively managed fund by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Mar 8, 2023. 8PSG.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009.
Performance
RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RGPM.NEO RBC Global Precious Metals Fund | 12.94% | 143.89% | 36.75% | -3.95% |
8PSG.DE Invesco Physical Gold A | 8.52% | 68.18% | 26.61% | 11.25% |
Different Trading Currencies
RGPM.NEO is traded in USD, while 8PSG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 8PSG.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGPM.NEO achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly higher than 8PSG.DE's 8.52% return.
RGPM.NEO
- 1D
- 3.88%
- 1M
- -15.14%
- YTD
- 12.94%
- 6M
- 28.32%
- 1Y
- 103.20%
- 3Y*
- 48.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
8PSG.DE
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -9.76%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 23.46%
- 1Y
- 52.64%
- 3Y*
- 34.07%
- 5Y*
- 22.36%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGPM.NEO has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than 8PSG.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RGPM.NEO
8PSG.DE
RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) and Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGPM.NEO | 8PSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 2.02 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 2.52 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.07 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.92 | 11.74 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGPM.NEO | 8PSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.02 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 1.12 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGPM.NEO and 8PSG.DE is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RGPM.NEO nor 8PSG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGPM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, which is greater than 8PSG.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGPM.NEO and 8PSG.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGPM.NEO | 8PSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.46% | -18.33% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.46% | -16.55% | -12.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.14% | -9.03% | -6.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -5.86% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.89% | 4.36% | +3.53% |
Volatility
RGPM.NEO vs. 8PSG.DE - Volatility Comparison
RBC Global Precious Metals Fund (RGPM.NEO) has a higher volatility of 16.12% compared to Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE) at 10.78%. This indicates that RGPM.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 8PSG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGPM.NEO | 8PSG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.12% | 10.78% | +5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.40% | 21.65% | +14.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.71% | 25.89% | +16.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.86% | 17.07% | +14.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.86% | 17.40% | +14.46% |