PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSG.DE vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

8PSG.DE vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

8PSG.DE vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
8PSG.DE
Invesco Physical Gold A
9.95%48.98%34.29%9.43%7.00%3.81%6.88%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-2.47%2.58%31.45%20.51%-14.45%36.38%10.76%
Different Trading Currencies

8PSG.DE is traded in EUR, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSG.DE achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -2.47% return.


8PSG.DE

1D
2.84%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
9.95%
6M
24.90%
1Y
42.07%
3Y*
31.10%
5Y*
22.74%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.45%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-0.63%
1Y
8.91%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSG.DE vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSG.DE
8PSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSG.DE vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


8PSG.DE^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

0.43

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

0.73

+1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.12

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

0.66

+1.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.82

2.77

+7.05

8PSG.DE vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSG.DE and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


8PSG.DE^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

0.43

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

0.64

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.45

+0.71

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSG.DE and ^GSPC is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

8PSG.DE vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -53.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSG.DE and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSG.DE^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.33%

-56.78%

+38.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.55%

-12.14%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-25.43%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-5.78%

-3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-10.75%

+4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

2.60%

+1.76%

Volatility

8PSG.DE vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.42%. This indicates that 8PSG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


8PSG.DE^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.24%

4.42%

+6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.09%

9.93%

+11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.81%

20.69%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

16.81%

-0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

18.63%

-2.55%