Correlation
The correlation between 8PSG.DE and QDVG.DE is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
8PSG.DE vs. QDVG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE).
8PSG.DE and QDVG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 8PSG.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Jun 24, 2009. QDVG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both 8PSG.DE and QDVG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 8PSG.DE or QDVG.DE.
Performance
8PSG.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
8PSG.DE:
2.06
QDVG.DE:
-0.87
8PSG.DE:
2.87
QDVG.DE:
-1.11
8PSG.DE:
1.38
QDVG.DE:
0.85
8PSG.DE:
6.06
QDVG.DE:
-0.74
8PSG.DE:
15.92
QDVG.DE:
-1.75
8PSG.DE:
2.14%
QDVG.DE:
8.43%
8PSG.DE:
15.92%
QDVG.DE:
16.47%
8PSG.DE:
-18.33%
QDVG.DE:
-26.77%
8PSG.DE:
-2.45%
QDVG.DE:
-19.39%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 8PSG.DE achieves a 16.35% return, which is significantly higher than QDVG.DE's -12.50% return.
8PSG.DE
16.35%
0.04%
15.99%
32.86%
18.68%
13.30%
N/A
QDVG.DE
-12.50%
-1.88%
-12.85%
-14.36%
1.05%
6.41%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
8PSG.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
8PSG.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVG.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
8PSG.DE vs. QDVG.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
8PSG.DE
QDVG.DE
8PSG.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
8PSG.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 8PSG.DE nor QDVG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
8PSG.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 8PSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, smaller than the maximum QDVG.DE drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSG.DE and QDVG.DE.
Loading data...
Volatility
8PSG.DE vs. QDVG.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Gold A (8PSG.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVG.DE) at 3.10%. This indicates that 8PSG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...