RGEAX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments Global Equity Fund (RGEAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
RGEAX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Feb 27, 2007. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
RGEAX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RGEAX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGEAX Russell Investments Global Equity Fund | -5.73% | 20.92% | 15.25% | 22.12% | -16.78% | 22.30% | 12.95% | 25.89% | -9.41% | 22.83% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGEAX achieves a -5.73% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RGEAX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 10.96%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
RGEAX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -9.11%
- YTD
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 15.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RGEAX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RGEAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RGEAX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
RGEAX
FGIAX
RGEAX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Global Equity Fund (RGEAX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RGEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.75 | -0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 2.26 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.61 | -1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 12.12 | -6.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RGEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.75 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.80 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.58 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.42 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between RGEAX and FGIAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RGEAX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
RGEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, less than FGIAX's 9.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGEAX Russell Investments Global Equity Fund | 8.83% | 8.33% | 7.28% | 1.04% | 1.67% | 6.85% | 29.97% | 13.77% | 15.65% | 13.13% | 8.21% | 11.12% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
RGEAX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGEAX drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGEAX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.78% | -49.35% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.89% | -8.29% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -21.08% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.85% | -38.02% | +3.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.51% | -3.78% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -7.22% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 1.78% | +0.71% |
Volatility
RGEAX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Russell Investments Global Equity Fund (RGEAX) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that RGEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RGEAX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 4.05% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.85% | 7.09% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 12.28% | +4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 13.08% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 15.17% | +1.98% |