RGA vs. FVRR
RGA (Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated) and FVRR (Fiverr International Ltd.) are both stocks. RGA operates in Insurance - Reinsurance (Financial Services), while FVRR operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, RGA returned 17.91%/yr vs -46.02%/yr for FVRR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RGA vs. FVRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RGA achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than FVRR's -44.13% return.
RGA
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 15.97%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
FVRR
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 11.97%
- 6M
- -39.14%
- YTD
- -44.13%
- 1Y
- -59.46%
- 3Y*
- -26.20%
- 5Y*
- -46.02%
- 10Y*
- —
RGA vs. FVRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 14.83% | -2.97% | 34.38% | 16.39% | 33.04% | -3.21% | -27.02% | 8.89% |
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | -44.13% | -37.72% | 16.57% | -6.59% | -74.37% | -41.72% | 730.21% | -9.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between RGA and FVRR is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between RGA and FVRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RGA:
$15.14B
FVRR:
$396.90M
RGA:
$20.15
FVRR:
$0.78
RGA:
11.47
FVRR:
14.15
RGA:
0.43
FVRR:
0.07
RGA:
0.57
FVRR:
0.95
RGA:
$18.13B
FVRR:
$429.22M
RGA:
$3.15B
FVRR:
$348.84M
RGA:
$1.46B
FVRR:
$33.15M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RGA vs. FVRR — Risk / Return Rank
RGA
FVRR
RGA vs. FVRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) and Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RGA | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.76 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | -0.93 | +2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | -1.41 | +5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RGA vs. FVRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RGA drawdown since its inception was -65.75%, smaller than the maximum FVRR drawdown of -97.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGA and FVRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RGA | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.75% | -97.02% | +31.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.68% | -64.67% | +51.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.11% | -72.86% | +45.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.11% | -96.28% | +69.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -96.58% | +96.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -67.97% | +56.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 42.89% | -37.59% |
Volatility
RGA vs. FVRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (RGA) is 6.22%, while Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a volatility of 18.08%. This indicates that RGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RGA | FVRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 18.08% | -11.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.21% | 41.53% | -24.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 50.24% | -26.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 64.25% | -36.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 70.88% | -37.98% |
Dividends
RGA vs. FVRR - Dividend Comparison
RGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while FVRR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVRR Fiverr International Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RGA Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.80% | 1.79% | 1.63% | 2.04% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.64% |
Financials
RGA vs. FVRR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and Fiverr International Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RGA vs. FVRR - Profitability Comparison
RGA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FVRR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 85.83M and revenue of 105.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.
RGA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported an operating income of 441.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
FVRR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 8.50M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
RGA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated reported a net income of 331.00K and revenue of 6.49M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.
FVRR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 8.56M and revenue of 105.49M, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RGA and FVRR have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVRR has higher volatility (18.08%) compared to RGA (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGA dropped -65.75% vs FVRR's -97.02%.
RGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RGA and FVRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer