RFV vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFV returned 12.53%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

RFV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RFV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.53%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.

RFV

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 6M: 10.71%
• 1Y: 25.06%
• 3Y*: 16.77%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: 12.53%

VOO

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 5.04%
• YTD: 10.91%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 28.04%
• 3Y*: 22.44%
• 5Y*: 13.90%
• 10Y*: 15.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	13.04%	7.66%	5.63%	30.26%	-3.99%	33.02%	9.61%	24.98%	-18.56%	14.74%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.91%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RFV and VOO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010	0.76

The correlation between RFV and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RFV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RFV	VOO
Consumer Cyclical	24.4%	10.2%
Financial Services	17.5%	11.6%
Energy	12.9%	3.5%
Technology	12.9%	35.7%
Industrials	11.4%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	4.9%
Basic Materials	7.6%	1.8%
Real Estate	3.5%	1.9%
Healthcare	0.7%	8.5%
Communication Services	-	11.3%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

RFV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFV

RFV Risk / Return Rank: 39
RFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
RFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
RFV Omega Ratio Rank: 37
RFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
RFV Martin Ratio Rank: 38

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 70
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFV	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.39	-0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	3.25	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	3.16	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	14.73	-8.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RFV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFV	VOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	2.39	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.83	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.87	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.89	-0.51

Drawdowns

RFV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFV	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.82%	-33.99%	-37.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.51%	-8.90%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.65%	-18.69%	-5.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.65%	-24.52%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.24%	-33.99%	-18.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-0.70%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-3.69%	-6.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	1.91%	+2.32%

Volatility

RFV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that RFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFV	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	2.84%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.86%	8.90%	+2.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.13%	11.80%	+6.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.08%	16.81%	+5.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.99%	18.01%	+6.98%

RFV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	1.84%	2.07%	1.31%	1.27%	2.05%	1.60%	1.52%	1.71%	1.39%	1.36%	0.88%	1.79%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.03%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFV and VOO in my portfolio?

RFV and VOO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFV or VOO?

RFV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFV dropped -71.82% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which ETF is better, RFV or VOO?

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 12.53% for RFV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFV or VOO?

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFV or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFV or VOO?

RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

What is the main difference between RFV and VOO?

RFV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RFV and 0.03% for VOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.