RFV vs. RWK

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) and RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFV returned 12.75%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for RWK. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWK.

Performance

RFV vs. RWK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly lower than RWK's 14.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RFV having a 12.75% annualized return and RWK not far ahead at 13.16%.

RFV

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 12.44%
• 6M: 10.55%
• 1Y: 22.29%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 11.17%
• 10Y*: 12.75%

RWK

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 14.32%
• 6M: 11.91%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 17.62%
• 5Y*: 11.68%
• 10Y*: 13.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFV vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	12.44%	7.66%	5.63%	30.26%	-3.99%	33.02%	9.61%	24.98%	-18.56%	14.74%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	14.32%	10.27%	11.94%	23.76%	-8.19%	34.31%	11.06%	28.20%	-14.65%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between RFV and RWK is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2008	0.92

The correlation between RFV and RWK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFV vs. RWK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RFV	RWK
Consumer Cyclical	25.5%	20.4%
Financial Services	17.4%	12.1%
Technology	14.2%	16.1%
Energy	12.1%	5.0%
Industrials	11.7%	22.1%
Basic Materials	7.6%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	10.4%
Real Estate	3.5%	2.6%
Healthcare	0.6%	4.2%
Communication Services	-	0.7%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

RFV vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFV

RFV Risk / Return Rank: 36
RFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RFV Omega Ratio Rank: 34
RFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RFV Martin Ratio Rank: 36

RWK

RWK Risk / Return Rank: 50
RWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
RWK Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
RWK Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFV vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFV	RWK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	1.67	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	2.51	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	2.53	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.27	8.11	-2.84

RFV vs. RWK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the RWK Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFV and RWK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFV vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than RWK's maximum drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and RWK.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFV	RWK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.82%	-56.49%	-15.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.51%	-11.14%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.65%	-24.58%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.65%	-24.58%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.24%	-46.20%	-6.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	-1.45%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-7.53%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.24%	3.46%	+0.78%

Volatility

RFV vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFV	RWK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	4.32%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.90%	12.11%	-0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	16.84%	+1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.98%	21.09%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.99%	22.97%	+2.02%

RFV vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFV vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison

RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than RWK's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	2.24%	2.07%	1.31%	1.27%	2.05%	1.60%	1.52%	1.71%	1.39%	1.36%	0.88%	1.79%
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF	1.36%	1.25%	1.11%	1.05%	1.18%	0.85%	0.96%	1.09%	1.22%	0.99%	1.30%	0.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFV and RWK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RFV and RWK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RFV or RWK?

RWK has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to RFV (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFV dropped -71.82% vs RWK's -56.49%.

Which ETF is better, RFV or RWK?

On 10-year performance, RWK leads with 13.16% vs 12.75% for RFV. On fees, RFV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFV or RWK?

Over the 10-year period, RWK has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 12.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFV or RWK?

RFV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFV or RWK?

RFV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.36% for RWK.

What is the main difference between RFV and RWK?

RFV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while RWK is Small Cap Blend Equities. RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while RWK tracks S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RFV and 0.39% for RWK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.