RFV vs. RFG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG).
RFV and RFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. RFG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both RFV and RFG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RFV vs. RFG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFV vs. RFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.24% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 14.74% |
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 4.55% | 8.80% | 17.80% | 16.42% | -21.70% | 13.81% | 32.86% | 17.09% | -13.98% | 20.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than RFG's 4.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RFV has outperformed RFG with an annualized return of 11.65%, while RFG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.
RFV
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
RFG
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.38%
- YTD
- 4.55%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFV vs. RFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RFV and RFG have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Return for Risk
RFV vs. RFG — Risk / Return Rank
RFV
RFG
RFV vs. RFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFV | RFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.10 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.69 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.90 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 8.23 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFV | RFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.10 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.21 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.39 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.40 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFV and RFG is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFV vs. RFG - Dividend Comparison
RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than RFG's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.04% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.38% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.05% | 0.27% | 0.64% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.35% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
RFV vs. RFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than RFG's maximum drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and RFG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFV | RFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.82% | -51.93% | -19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -13.44% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | -35.16% | +10.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -42.92% | -9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.48% | -7.11% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -9.03% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 3.10% | +1.68% |
Volatility
RFV vs. RFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) is 5.23%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) has a volatility of 8.63%. This indicates that RFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFV | RFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 8.63% | -3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | 14.19% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.40% | 23.25% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 22.73% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 22.98% | +2.07% |