RFV vs. RFG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG).
RFV and RFG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. RFG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both RFV and RFG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RFV or RFG.
Correlation
The correlation between RFV and RFG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RFV vs. RFG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RFV:
-0.00
RFG:
-0.30
RFV:
0.17
RFG:
-0.26
RFV:
1.02
RFG:
0.97
RFV:
-0.00
RFG:
-0.27
RFV:
-0.00
RFG:
-0.81
RFV:
7.14%
RFG:
8.96%
RFV:
24.24%
RFG:
24.50%
RFV:
-71.82%
RFG:
-51.93%
RFV:
-15.70%
RFG:
-17.97%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a -9.11% return, which is significantly higher than RFG's -9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RFV has outperformed RFG with an annualized return of 8.85%, while RFG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.78% annualized return.
RFV
-9.11%
-5.32%
-6.99%
-0.99%
23.10%
8.85%
RFG
-9.60%
-4.71%
-9.77%
-9.14%
12.47%
5.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFV vs. RFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RFV and RFG have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RFV vs. RFG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
RFV
RFG
RFV vs. RFG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RFV vs. RFG - Dividend Comparison
RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than RFG's 0.34% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% |
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.64% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.35% | 0.61% | 0.60% |
Drawdowns
RFV vs. RFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than RFG's maximum drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and RFG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RFV vs. RFG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) at 15.63%. This indicates that RFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.