PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFG vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RFG vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RFG vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
5.89%8.80%17.80%16.42%-21.70%13.81%32.86%17.09%-13.98%20.46%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
3.19%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFG achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than SCHA's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RFG has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 9.17%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.


RFG

1D
1.27%
1M
-5.93%
YTD
5.89%
6M
8.54%
1Y
26.07%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
5.10%
10Y*
9.17%

SCHA

1D
0.93%
1M
-4.33%
YTD
3.19%
6M
5.66%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFG vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RFG vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFG
RFG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
RFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFG vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFGSCHADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

1.16

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.74

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.87

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.69

7.77

+0.92

RFG vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFG and SCHA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFGSCHADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.16

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.21

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.44

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.53

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between RFG and SCHA is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RFG vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

RFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SCHA's 1.16% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFG
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF
0.36%0.43%0.38%0.99%0.78%0.05%0.27%0.64%0.76%0.66%0.35%0.61%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.16%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Drawdowns

RFG vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFG drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFG and SCHA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RFGSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.93%

-42.41%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.44%

-14.35%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.16%

-30.79%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.92%

-42.41%

-0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

-5.41%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-7.65%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.45%

-0.32%

Volatility

RFG vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 7.31%. This indicates that RFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RFGSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.51%

7.31%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

13.72%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

22.90%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.73%

21.95%

+0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.98%

22.67%

+0.31%