RFG vs. VOT
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT).
RFG and VOT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. VOT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Mid Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2006. Both RFG and VOT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RFG or VOT.
Correlation
The correlation between RFG and VOT is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RFG vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RFG:
1.02
VOT:
1.24
RFG:
1.50
VOT:
1.71
RFG:
1.18
VOT:
1.22
RFG:
1.17
VOT:
0.99
RFG:
4.34
VOT:
7.24
RFG:
4.48%
VOT:
2.58%
RFG:
19.13%
VOT:
15.12%
RFG:
-51.93%
VOT:
-60.17%
RFG:
-8.88%
VOT:
-6.98%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFG achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 17.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RFG has underperformed VOT with an annualized return of 7.80%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.
RFG
18.30%
-2.95%
-0.94%
18.03%
10.36%
7.80%
VOT
17.05%
-1.21%
10.73%
17.75%
10.78%
10.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFG vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RFG vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RFG vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
RFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than VOT's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 0.32% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.64% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.35% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.65% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
RFG vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFG drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFG and VOT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RFG vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 5.37%. This indicates that RFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.