RFEM vs. SDEM
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM).
RFEM and SDEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFEM is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. SDEM is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend. It was launched on Mar 17, 2015.
Performance
RFEM vs. SDEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFEM vs. SDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF | 3.81% | 27.71% | 10.85% | 20.78% | -19.05% | 0.97% | 8.19% | 20.33% | -18.80% | 35.73% |
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 9.02% | 32.01% | 4.02% | 12.64% | -21.53% | 2.11% | -11.13% | 17.56% | -17.40% | 16.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than SDEM's 9.02% return.
RFEM
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 9.28%
- 1Y
- 28.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- —
SDEM
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFEM vs. SDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SDEM's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFEM vs. SDEM — Risk / Return Rank
RFEM
SDEM
RFEM vs. SDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFEM | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 2.15 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 2.80 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.31 | -0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.67 | 13.51 | -3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFEM | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.15 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.29 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.18 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFEM and SDEM is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFEM vs. SDEM - Dividend Comparison
RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than SDEM's 4.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF | 1.97% | 1.98% | 3.64% | 3.28% | 7.74% | 3.21% | 1.22% | 3.75% | 2.37% | 1.62% | 3.73% | 0.00% |
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 4.92% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
Drawdowns
RFEM vs. SDEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, smaller than the maximum SDEM drawdown of -47.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and SDEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFEM | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.22% | -47.38% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.90% | -9.78% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.06% | -36.72% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -4.01% | -4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -20.99% | +8.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.39% | +0.58% |
Volatility
RFEM vs. SDEM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) at 7.05%. This indicates that RFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFEM | SDEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 7.05% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.83% | 10.37% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.10% | 15.29% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 17.35% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 19.31% | +0.45% |