RFEM vs. AVEM
RFEM (First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF) and AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while AVEM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. RFEM is actively managed, while AVEM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RFEM returned 8.99%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for AVEM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFEM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVEM.
Performance
RFEM vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a 21.66% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 27.59% return.
RFEM
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 21.66%
- 6M
- 23.54%
- 1Y
- 45.49%
- 3Y*
- 24.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- —
AVEM
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 27.59%
- 6M
- 29.75%
- 1Y
- 55.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
RFEM vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF | 21.66% | 27.71% | 10.85% | 20.78% | -19.05% | 0.97% | 8.19% | 12.52% |
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.59% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | 5.16% | 14.39% | 11.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFEM and AVEM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between RFEM and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
RFEM vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RFEM
AVEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
RFEM
AVEM
Financial Services
RFEM
AVEM
Consumer Cyclical
RFEM
AVEM
Industrials
RFEM
AVEM
Energy
RFEM
AVEM
Communication Services
RFEM
AVEM
Basic Materials
RFEM
AVEM
Consumer Defensive
RFEM
AVEM
Healthcare
RFEM
AVEM
Utilities
RFEM
AVEM
Real Estate
RFEM
AVEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFEM vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank
RFEM
AVEM
RFEM vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFEM | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.51 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 4.21 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.99 | 16.70 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFEM | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.84 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.54 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.66 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
RFEM vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, which is greater than AVEM's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and AVEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFEM | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.22% | -36.05% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -13.13% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -18.02% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.73% | -34.00% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -1.39% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.98% | -10.09% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.30% | -0.45% |
Volatility
RFEM vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) is 6.86%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that RFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFEM | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 8.33% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.37% | 16.72% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 19.45% | -2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 18.34% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 20.55% | -0.74% |
RFEM vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFEM vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison
RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than AVEM's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF | 1.68% | 1.98% | 3.64% | 3.28% | 7.74% | 3.21% | 1.22% | 3.75% | 2.37% | 1.62% | 3.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, RFEM and AVEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to RFEM (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEM dropped -42.22% vs AVEM's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, AVEM leads with 9.92% vs 8.99% for RFEM. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, RFEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RFEM.
AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 1.68% for RFEM.
RFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVEM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RFEM and 0.33% for AVEM.
AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFEM and AVEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer