PortfoliosLab logo
RFEM vs. FEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RFEM and FEM is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RFEM vs. FEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%55.00%60.00%65.00%70.00%75.00%80.00%85.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
76.86%
76.29%
RFEM
FEM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RFEM:

0.40

FEM:

-0.09

Sortino Ratio

RFEM:

0.69

FEM:

0.00

Omega Ratio

RFEM:

1.09

FEM:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

RFEM:

0.47

FEM:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

RFEM:

1.34

FEM:

-0.25

Ulcer Index

RFEM:

5.54%

FEM:

7.81%

Daily Std Dev

RFEM:

18.67%

FEM:

19.93%

Max Drawdown

RFEM:

-42.22%

FEM:

-46.24%

Current Drawdown

RFEM:

-4.48%

FEM:

-6.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than FEM's 4.95% return.


RFEM

YTD

3.70%

1M

13.46%

6M

-0.16%

1Y

7.50%

5Y*

9.06%

10Y*

N/A

FEM

YTD

4.95%

1M

15.75%

6M

-0.62%

1Y

-1.82%

5Y*

8.04%

10Y*

2.88%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFEM vs. FEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEM's 0.80% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RFEM vs. FEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RFEM is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RFEM is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RFEM is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RFEM is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RFEM is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RFEM is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEM is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEM is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEM is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEM is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEM is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEM is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RFEM vs. FEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RFEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the FEM Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEM and FEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.40
-0.09
RFEM
FEM

Dividends

RFEM vs. FEM - Dividend Comparison

RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than FEM's 3.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
3.51%3.64%3.28%7.74%3.21%1.22%3.75%2.37%1.62%3.73%0.00%0.00%
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
3.25%3.66%4.97%6.16%4.15%2.68%3.30%3.52%2.45%2.26%3.62%2.85%

Drawdowns

RFEM vs. FEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, smaller than the maximum FEM drawdown of -46.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and FEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-4.48%
-6.01%
RFEM
FEM

Volatility

RFEM vs. FEM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) have volatilities of 7.93% and 7.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.93%
7.76%
RFEM
FEM