PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RFEM vs. FEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RFEM and FEM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

RFEM vs. FEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%55.00%60.00%65.00%70.00%75.00%80.00%85.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
66.57%
66.20%
RFEM
FEM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RFEM:

0.32

FEM:

-0.12

Sortino Ratio

RFEM:

0.58

FEM:

-0.04

Omega Ratio

RFEM:

1.08

FEM:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

RFEM:

0.38

FEM:

-0.13

Martin Ratio

RFEM:

1.10

FEM:

-0.33

Ulcer Index

RFEM:

5.37%

FEM:

7.55%

Daily Std Dev

RFEM:

18.54%

FEM:

19.81%

Max Drawdown

RFEM:

-42.22%

FEM:

-46.24%

Current Drawdown

RFEM:

-10.04%

FEM:

-11.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a -2.34% return, which is significantly lower than FEM's -1.05% return.


RFEM

YTD

-2.34%

1M

-8.45%

6M

-5.82%

1Y

7.31%

5Y*

7.98%

10Y*

N/A

FEM

YTD

-1.05%

1M

-8.80%

6M

-4.36%

1Y

-1.38%

5Y*

7.23%

10Y*

2.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFEM vs. FEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEM's 0.80% expense ratio.


RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
Expense ratio chart for RFEM: current value is 0.95%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RFEM: 0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FEM: current value is 0.80%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FEM: 0.80%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RFEM vs. FEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RFEM is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RFEM is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RFEM is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RFEM is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RFEM is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RFEM is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEM is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEM is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEM is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEM is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEM is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEM is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RFEM vs. FEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RFEM, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
RFEM: 0.32
FEM: -0.12
The chart of Sortino ratio for RFEM, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
RFEM: 0.58
FEM: -0.04
The chart of Omega ratio for RFEM, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
RFEM: 1.08
FEM: 1.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for RFEM, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
RFEM: 0.38
FEM: -0.13
The chart of Martin ratio for RFEM, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
RFEM: 1.10
FEM: -0.33

The current RFEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the FEM Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEM and FEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.32
-0.12
RFEM
FEM

Dividends

RFEM vs. FEM - Dividend Comparison

RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than FEM's 3.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
3.72%3.64%3.28%7.74%3.21%1.22%3.75%2.37%1.62%3.73%0.00%0.00%
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
3.45%3.66%4.97%6.16%4.15%2.68%3.30%3.52%2.45%2.26%3.62%2.85%

Drawdowns

RFEM vs. FEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, smaller than the maximum FEM drawdown of -46.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and FEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-10.04%
-11.38%
RFEM
FEM

Volatility

RFEM vs. FEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) is 10.44%, while First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that RFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
10.44%
11.60%
RFEM
FEM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab