RFDA vs. XOVR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) and XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RFDA returned 13.07%/yr vs 3.91%/yr for XOVR. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RFDA charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XOVR.

Performance

RFDA vs. XOVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than XOVR's -1.19% return.

RFDA

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: 14.27%
• YTD: 15.99%
• 1Y: 26.63%
• 3Y*: 19.35%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 13.43%
• ALL TIME*: 13.55%

XOVR

• 1D: 3.43%
• 1M: -5.24%
• 6M: 9.88%
• YTD: -1.19%
• 1Y: -0.30%
• 3Y*: 18.13%
• 5Y*: 3.91%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	$111.59K	$107.70K	$119.19K
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF	$33.62M	$37.29M	$109.88M

RFDA vs. XOVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	15.99%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	27.15%	-9.27%	4.11%
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF	-1.19%	11.83%	33.21%	51.89%	-41.09%	-7.24%	50.39%	31.72%	-5.02%	1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDA and XOVR is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between RFDA and XOVR has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RFDA vs. XOVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RFDA	XOVR
Financial Services	18.8%	9.9%
Technology	15.4%	34.5%
Healthcare	12.2%	18.5%
Energy	11.1%	3.1%
Industrials	9.3%	6.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	-
Communication Services	6.2%	24.2%
Real Estate	5.1%	-
Utilities	4.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

RFDA vs. XOVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 89
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 87
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

XOVR

XOVR Risk / Return Rank: 10
XOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
XOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 10
XOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
XOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RFDA vs. XOVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFDA	XOVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	-0.01	+2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	0.15	+3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.02	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	-0.01	+4.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.57	-0.03	+17.60

RFDA vs. XOVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDA Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the XOVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDA and XOVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFDA vs. XOVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum XOVR drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and XOVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFDA	XOVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.60%	-56.28%	+21.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-24.32%	+18.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.35%	-25.23%	+5.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.35%	-49.35%	+30.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.34%	+8.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-18.21%	+14.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	11.54%	-10.02%

Volatility

RFDA vs. XOVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is 2.97%, while ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that RFDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFDA	XOVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	8.49%	-5.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.70%	19.37%	-10.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.66%	23.87%	-12.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	26.72%	-10.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	27.05%	-10.21%

RFDA vs. XOVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than XOVR's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFDA vs. XOVR - Dividend Comparison

RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.74%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	57.75%	6.31%	0.08%	3.71%	0.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFDA and XOVR in my portfolio?

RFDA and XOVR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFDA or XOVR?

XOVR has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to RFDA (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDA dropped -34.60% vs XOVR's -56.28%.

Which ETF is better, RFDA or XOVR?

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.07% vs 3.91% for XOVR. On fees, RFDA is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RFDA or XOVR?

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.07% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFDA or XOVR?

RFDA is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFDA or XOVR?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.

What is the main difference between RFDA and XOVR?

They also come from different issuers: SS&C and ERShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for RFDA and 0.75% for XOVR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.